2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distributions of helium isotopes and tritium along the U.S. GEOTRACES North Atlantic sections (GEOTRACES GAO3)

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe present the distributions of helium isotopes (in the form of helium isotope ratio anomaly relative to the atmospheric ratio) and tritium along two sections occupied in the subtropical North Atlantic as part of the first U.S. GEOTRACES survey (GEOTRACES GA03). The general distributions of these isotopes are consistent with the continuing penetration and evolution of bomb-produced tritium and its daughter isotope 3 He in the main thermocline and along the western boundary current system. We com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt an empirical relationship between deep water ∆Ne and ∆He in an area without significant hydrothermal helium contributions, namely the North Atlantic away from Mid Atlantic Ridge. Using recent data from the U.S. North Atlantic GEOTRACES GA03 cruise (Jenkins et al, 2014a;Jenkins et al, 2014b) we find a molar ratio of 0.22 ± 0.01 between excess He and excess Ne below 1000 m depth. The fact that this value is significantly lower than the atmospheric abundance ratio of 0.288 is a reflection of the intertwined effects of thermal disequilibrium (Hamme and Severinghaus, 2007) and partial vs. complete bubble injection processes (Jenkins, 1988;Stanley et al, 2009b;Liang et al, 2013) during water mass formation.…”
Section: Pg 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt an empirical relationship between deep water ∆Ne and ∆He in an area without significant hydrothermal helium contributions, namely the North Atlantic away from Mid Atlantic Ridge. Using recent data from the U.S. North Atlantic GEOTRACES GA03 cruise (Jenkins et al, 2014a;Jenkins et al, 2014b) we find a molar ratio of 0.22 ± 0.01 between excess He and excess Ne below 1000 m depth. The fact that this value is significantly lower than the atmospheric abundance ratio of 0.288 is a reflection of the intertwined effects of thermal disequilibrium (Hamme and Severinghaus, 2007) and partial vs. complete bubble injection processes (Jenkins, 1988;Stanley et al, 2009b;Liang et al, 2013) during water mass formation.…”
Section: Pg 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 420 m, [Nd] is constant to 2,100 m and increases from 17.5 ± 0.5 to 19.6 pmol/kg at 2,990 m. The typical increase below 2,000 m was documented in other studies in the Atlantic Ocean and most recently, based on high resolution profiles, has been attributed to a combination of increase from particle release and lateral advection of preformed REE along with reversible scavenging (Siddall et al, 2008;Stichel et al, 2015;Lambelet et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2016). This increasing slope in [Nd] is interrupted by a sudden decrease at 3,184 m, coinciding with the upper FIGURE 2 | Vertical distribution of dissolved Nd concentration (A), Nd isotopic composition (B) and (C) mantle derived excess He (xs 3 He, Jenkins et al, 2015a). Color coding the same as in Figure 1.…”
Section: Vertical and Lateral Distribution Of Water Masses At Tagmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure is designed with ODV ® software (Schlitzer, 2016a). extent of the TAG hydrothermal plume (Jenkins et al, 2015a).…”
Section: Vertical and Lateral Distribution Of Water Masses At Tagmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of included isopycnal surfaces was chosen so that layers reside predominantly in the mesopelagic, between 100-1500 m. Shallower isopycnal surfaces were excluded (>25.375 kg m -3 for the GP16 section and >26.125 kg m -3 for the GA03 section), in part because they are mixed on timescales < 5 years, especially in the North Atlantic, and therefore do not represent the same level of integration as the underlying surfaces Jenkins et al, 2015). As a result, aggregate dCo:PO 4 relationships are more complex and require fine-scale approaches to derive stoichiometry (Saito et al submitted).…”
Section: Isopycnal Scavenging Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%