2011
DOI: 10.1332/175982711x559163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distributional consequences of the 2010 Spending Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst the UK coalition Government contested that those with the ‘broadest shoulders’ would bear the burden of these cuts, empirical analysis suggests otherwise (Mulholland and Watt ). As Horton and Reed (: 23) argue, ‘the poorest 10 percent of households are losing around 15 times as much from spending cuts as the richest 1 percent of households’. Some of the most vulnerable groups have been impacted.…”
Section: Poverty In Austere Times: the Uk Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the UK coalition Government contested that those with the ‘broadest shoulders’ would bear the burden of these cuts, empirical analysis suggests otherwise (Mulholland and Watt ). As Horton and Reed (: 23) argue, ‘the poorest 10 percent of households are losing around 15 times as much from spending cuts as the richest 1 percent of households’. Some of the most vulnerable groups have been impacted.…”
Section: Poverty In Austere Times: the Uk Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the approach taken by Horton and Reed (2011) in their analysis of the distributional impact of the October 2010 Spending Review. gender in the sphere of finance in responses to the crisis Just as women were in a small minority among the private sector financial decision makers whose actions led to the financial crisis in 2008, they were also in a small minority among the key decision makers in public sector institutions responding to the crisis.…”
Section: Spheres Of Finance Production and Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 It should be noted that if we were to include the other £32 billion of spending cuts (which cannot be allocated based on household data on use of public services) as 'flat rate' cuts per household, the impact of the spending cuts would be even more regressive as a proportion of income than is shown in this section. This was the approach taken by Horton and Reed (2011) in their analysis of the distributional impact of the October 2010 Spending Review.…”
Section: Spheres Of Finance Production and Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-being of those living on reduced incomes can be negatively affected by the loss of income and increased costs during times of economic crisis. At the same time poorer households are also more adversely affected by spending cuts to social care and social housing budgets (Horton and Reed, 2011). This paper has suggested that economic well-being is an essential component of an individual's needs (DH, 2010), and therefore should to be taken into consideration during social work assessment processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%