1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02656567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of substitutional alloying elements during the bainite transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The X-ray analysis also revealed a considerable supersaturation of carbon in the bainitic ferrite [1][2][3][4]. Similar supersaturation has been measured previously using atom probe analysis [6,7] and convergent beam electron diffraction analysis [8] in low-carbon steels. This supersaturation was attributed to the trapping of carbon at the dislocations [5] in the bainitic ferrite.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The X-ray analysis also revealed a considerable supersaturation of carbon in the bainitic ferrite [1][2][3][4]. Similar supersaturation has been measured previously using atom probe analysis [6,7] and convergent beam electron diffraction analysis [8] in low-carbon steels. This supersaturation was attributed to the trapping of carbon at the dislocations [5] in the bainitic ferrite.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…%, higher than the corresponding XRD and o T  (7.0 at. %) values and less than the 3 Ae value (20.7 at. %).…”
Section: O T  Curve During Bainite Formationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is worth mentioning that the composition of phases was determined in the volumes free of visible carbon segregation, such as clusters, atmospheres at dislocations, and boundaries. Thus, the remaining supersaturation in carbon compared to the paraequilibrium value could not be explained, as proposed previously by Stark et al, [47] by the trapping of carbon at dislocations. However, it could be considered that trapping still takes place, but the levels of carbon at dislocations are much lower than those of Cottrell atmospheres and, thus, are not identifiable by APT.…”
Section: Atom Probe Analysismentioning
confidence: 66%