1960
DOI: 10.1007/bf01471924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of ionization along a beam of ?-radiation and the determination of radiation dose with normal ionization chambers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There¬ fore, the air absorption correction should be less than that for the distance between the center of the collecting region and the diaphragm. This decrease has been computed to be 0.8 percent for cobalt-60 gamma rays and 0.4 percent for cesium-137 gamma rays (Aglintsev and Ostromukhova, 1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There¬ fore, the air absorption correction should be less than that for the distance between the center of the collecting region and the diaphragm. This decrease has been computed to be 0.8 percent for cobalt-60 gamma rays and 0.4 percent for cesium-137 gamma rays (Aglintsev and Ostromukhova, 1959).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimate of the reduction required in the absorption correction has been provided by Wyckoff [3]. From measurements of electronic equilibrium requirements for 60CO and 137CS gamma rays in a parallel-plate pressure chamber, and the calculations of Roesch [4] and Aglintsev [5] , he computed the required reduction in the absorption correction to be 0.2 percent for 137 CS gamma rays and carbon·walled cavity chambers. The saturation correction for the exposure rates encountered in these measurements is 0.2 percent and the correction for scatter from the supporting stem and shank of the chamber is 0.1 percent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%