2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1611.05595
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of $H_{8}$-extensions of quadratic fields

Abstract: We compute all the moments of a normalization of the function which counts unramified H 8 -extensions of quadratic fields, where H 8 is the quaternion group of order 8, and show that the values of this function determine a point mass distribution. Furthermore we propose a similar modification to the non-abelian Cohen-Lenstra heuristics for unramified G-extensions of quadratic fields for G in a large class of 2-groups, which we conjecture will give finite moments which determine a distribution. Our method addit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). See also [AK16,Kly17] for further evidence that the answer to Question 6.1 is yes. The argument for Theorem 1.2 could be used to suggest a value for c ± G,G in the function field case, but it would not be clear how to make the analogous constant in the number field case.…”
Section: A Refined Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…). See also [AK16,Kly17] for further evidence that the answer to Question 6.1 is yes. The argument for Theorem 1.2 could be used to suggest a value for c ± G,G in the function field case, but it would not be clear how to make the analogous constant in the number field case.…”
Section: A Refined Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where the first contribution comes from the R ramified at l, and the second from the R unramified at l. 2 Meanwhile, the value of the average for p " c is p p `1 `p p `1, where the first contribution comes from R ramified at p and the second from R unramified at p. Lastly, we consider the case p 2 |c. Remarkably enough, one observes that the case p " 3 acquires a special status in the computation of this average: indeed 1 8 of the imaginary quadratics locally at 3 give the extension Q 3 pζ 3 q{Q 3 , and the result for them will be different than for the 1 8 totally ramified that locally at 3 become Q 3 p ? 3q.…”
Section: Collecting All Discriminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If K is not strongly of type R, we set S 1 2 pKq to be the symbol ‚. We now proceed by offering a heuristic model for S 1 2 pKq as K varies among imaginary quadratic number fields of type R. Let R be an unramified ring at c and denote by G 2 a set of representatives of isomorphism classes of finite abelian 2-groups, viewed as C 2 -modules under the action of ´Id. Denote by S 2 pRq the union of the singleton t‚u and of the set of equivalence classes of pairs pG, θq, where G P G 2 , θ P Ą Ext Z 2 rC 2 s pG, W R r2 8 sq and the equivalence is defined as follows: two pairs pG 1 , θ 1 q, pG 2 , θ 2 q are identified if G 1 " G 2 and θ 1 , θ 2 are in the same Aut ring pRqˆAut ab.gr.…”
Section: Proposition 33 One Has That ąmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations