2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1681268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distribution of Firm Size in India: What Can Survey Data Tell Us?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This section describes some key features of these data for our study, and our unpublished data appendix (available upon request) provides greater details. Nataraj (2009), Kathuria et al (2010), Hasan and Jandoc (2010), Dehejia and Panagariya (2010), and Fernandes and Pakes (2010) provide detailed overviews of similarly constructed databases.…”
Section: Indian Entrepreneurship Data In Manufacturing and Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section describes some key features of these data for our study, and our unpublished data appendix (available upon request) provides greater details. Nataraj (2009), Kathuria et al (2010), Hasan and Jandoc (2010), Dehejia and Panagariya (2010), and Fernandes and Pakes (2010) provide detailed overviews of similarly constructed databases.…”
Section: Indian Entrepreneurship Data In Manufacturing and Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hsieh and Olken (2014) find that large firms in these countries tend to be constrained in their growth as they are subject to above-market wages, onerous regulations and higher taxes. Almeida and Carneiro (2008) and Hasan and Jandoc (2010) reach broadly similar conclusions for Brazil and India respectively.…”
Section: Making It Easier For Higher-quality Businesses To Flourishmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However the wage bill explains almost as much dispersion in productivity using Danish manufacturing and services data. Hasan and Jandoc (2010) especially find that more flexible labor regulations are correlated with larger firms. Thus, it shows the role of institutions in the size and productivity of firms.…”
Section: B Endogeneity Of Employment Qualitymentioning
confidence: 89%