1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(67)90022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distribution of and swelling produced by fission gas bubbles in α and β uranium irradiated under low stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the (001) surface energy is calculated and shown to match with experiment, but it is substantially smaller than other MD results and the two independent GGA calculations. Reference: a [20]; b [9]; c [18]; d [29]; e [34]; f [35].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Comb And Eam Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the (001) surface energy is calculated and shown to match with experiment, but it is substantially smaller than other MD results and the two independent GGA calculations. Reference: a [20]; b [9]; c [18]; d [29]; e [34]; f [35].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Comb And Eam Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be smaller than the actual value due to the mosaic structure of the sample. Additionally, there are three other activation energy values reported in the literature (1.99 eV [22,23], 2.15 eV [24,25] and 2.21 eV [26,27]), which do not specify the direction. All of these values are within the range 1.91-2.91 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). It should be noted that according to existing ideas [6,7], a structure with substantially smaller pores is formed in uranium and its alloys under irradiation -the average pore diameter is 0.005-0.05 µm and the number of pores reaches 7·10 15 cm -3 . Apparently, the methods used to perform the investigations made it possible to observe only the largest pores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%