1941
DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1941.233980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distribution of Amplitude with Time in Fluctuation Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 r For these distributions, the most likely value of envelope amplitude is r, the mean is 1.252r, and the standard deviation of envelope amplitude is .655r (Landon, 1942). This means that the standard deviation of envelope amplitude is .655r ‫ס‬ .655M /1.242 ‫ס‬ .527M where M is the amplitude of the mean envelope.…”
Section: Ensemble Average Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 r For these distributions, the most likely value of envelope amplitude is r, the mean is 1.252r, and the standard deviation of envelope amplitude is .655r (Landon, 1942). This means that the standard deviation of envelope amplitude is .655r ‫ס‬ .655M /1.242 ‫ס‬ .527M where M is the amplitude of the mean envelope.…”
Section: Ensemble Average Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of trace and envelope amplitudes for waveforms composed of a superposition of oscillations having the same frequency but random phase was studied by Rayleigh (1880) and later by Landon (1941Landon ( , 1942. Landon (1942) shows that the distribution of instantaneous amplitudes of a waveform composed of a sum of waves of the same frequency but random phase is given by 1 2 2 ‫מ‬g /2r…”
Section: Ensemble Average Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with Landon in [36], the form of his proof has a Bayesian interpretation allowing a simple conversion from Likelihoodist to Bayesian thinking.…”
Section: White's Proofmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…What is important is the distinction between methods available when there is one error in the decision process versus two errors as in normal equity trading. Additionally, the proof by Landon in [36] allows a direct linkage between the subjective decisions of individual actors and the calculation of the distribution that exists in equilibrium Because of the relationship between subjective personal realities and objective market relationships, there will be a slight notation change. For the personal calculated rewards of a subjective actor, the notation will be i t r at time t while the equilibrium return will be t r .…”
Section: The Distribution Of Mergers For Cashmentioning
confidence: 99%