1985
DOI: 10.2307/1251176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Distraction Hypothesis and Radio Advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interesting, appealing, fascinating, exciting, and involving represent one grouping. This agrees with other researchers' perception of involvement based on relevant emotions (Nelson, Duncan, and Frontczak 1985) and represents half of the scale items. The other five items might be described as more rational or cognitive in nature: important, relevant, valuable, means a lot to me, and needed.…”
Section: Scale Dimensionalitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Interesting, appealing, fascinating, exciting, and involving represent one grouping. This agrees with other researchers' perception of involvement based on relevant emotions (Nelson, Duncan, and Frontczak 1985) and represents half of the scale items. The other five items might be described as more rational or cognitive in nature: important, relevant, valuable, means a lot to me, and needed.…”
Section: Scale Dimensionalitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Also humor research reports that humor may inhibit or disrupt processing of other stimuli and may lead subjects to be less sensitive to other elements of the message (e.g., Nelson, Duncan, & Frontczak, 1985). The present findings suggest that this assumption with respect to positive affect and humor should not always be true.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Allyn und Festinger (1961) deckten auf, dass Individuen mit geteilter Aufmerksamkeit weniger Gegenargumente gegenüber einer Botschaft entwickeln und sich demzufolge leichter durch diese beeinflussen lassen als Individuen, die sich uneingeschränkt der Verarbeitung der Botschaft widmen (Gardner 1970;Haslett 1976;Keating u. Brock 1974). Allerdings brachte die empirische Überprüfung dieser Hypothese widersprüchliche Befunde hervor (Nelson et al 1985;Silverthorne u. Mazmanian 1975;Ware u. Tucker 1974). Auch die betriebswirtschaftliche Studie von Bither (1972) liefert keinen Beleg für die aus der Theory of Distraction hergeleitete Vermutung, dass der Akzent als ablenkendes Gestaltungsmerkmal die nachgelagerte Einstellungsänderung des Rezipienten positiv beeinflusst.…”
Section: Aktivierung Von Argumentenunclassified