2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-3119-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness

Abstract: Distortion (Denneberg 1990) is a well known premium calculation principle for insurance contracts. In this paper, we study sensitivity properties of distortion functionals w.r.t. the assumptions for risk aversion as well as robustness w.r.t. ambiguity of the loss distribution. Ambiguity is measured by the Wasserstein distance. We study variances of distances for probability models and identify some worst case distributions. In addition to the direct problem we also investigate the inverse problem, that is how … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we assume that the true weighting function of a decision maker is roughly known either based on empirical data or based on a subjective judgement. For example, Escobar and Pflug [14] propose an effective approach to construct a step-like distortion function with empirical data and use it to approximate the true unknown distortion/weighting function in an insurance premium calculation model. We call such an estimated weighting function as nominal weighting function.…”
Section: Construction Of Ambiguity Set W Of Weighting Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we assume that the true weighting function of a decision maker is roughly known either based on empirical data or based on a subjective judgement. For example, Escobar and Pflug [14] propose an effective approach to construct a step-like distortion function with empirical data and use it to approximate the true unknown distortion/weighting function in an insurance premium calculation model. We call such an estimated weighting function as nominal weighting function.…”
Section: Construction Of Ambiguity Set W Of Weighting Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and Meng [ 5 ] corrected the skewness and heavy tail problem of insurance loss using a Bayesian nonparametric regression model based on Gaussian distribution. Escobar and Pflug [ 6 ] determined the worst case of insurance distribution with the distance variance of the probability model. These methods can produce more appropriate empirical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been pursued e.g., for distributionally robust portfolio optimisation over neighborhoods of a reference probability measure by [31,40,28,16] or more generally for stochastic programming problems as in [29,5,3,35,32]. For the special case of distributional robust versions of Value at Risk (VaR) we refer to [27] and [26], where the risk measure is robustified via the concept of sublinear expectations, and also by [10], where the supremum of VaR over a set of possible joint distributions with prespecified marginals is computed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%