The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays.

Abstract

The distorted room illusion (DRI) and the attendant argument for perceptual ambiguity is critically analyzed from a Gibsonian/ecological point of view. The notions of multiple specification, conflicting information, and perceptual skill are invoked in showing how the ecological approach can accommodate illusion effects that may remain under mobile binocular viewing conditions. Static optic arrays are shown not to be ambiguous. So-called equivalent configurations are found to be analytic artifacts, appearing when the problem of information is treated in geometrical terms without regard for constraints due to physical and ecological regularities. The relative importance of motion-based and motion-independent information is discussed.

Perceiving the size of trees: Biological form and the horizon ratio

“…Thus, in a well-constructed room (Runeson, 1988), the implicit horizon would be determined by extrapolating the texture gradient projected from the floor. The problem with this notion is that it only works with level surfaces.…”

The Pickup of Nonspecifying Variables Does Not Entail Indirect Perception

“…Likewise, the mere fact that ambient arrays are a function of environmental properties does not prove that such functions always have an inverse. (p. 199) As Runeson (1988) argued, specificity is contingent on constraints. That is, it is by virtue of physical laws and ecological constraints that informational variables are related one-to-one to environmental properties.…”

On the Apparent Paradox of Learning and Realism

“…Runeson (1988) argued that constraints are grantors of information. Constraints are regularities that hold in to-be-considered ecologies.…”