1988
DOI: 10.1086/166514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The distance to the center of the Galaxy - H2O maser proper motions in Sagittarius B2(N)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
145
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
145
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 from Reid et al (1988). Considering the beam major axis (∼0.9 ), we derive relative positional accuracies between 0.2 for SNR of 4.6 (LB31) and ∼5 mas for a SNR of 176 (LB14).…”
Section: Alma Observationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1 from Reid et al (1988). Considering the beam major axis (∼0.9 ), we derive relative positional accuracies between 0.2 for SNR of 4.6 (LB31) and ∼5 mas for a SNR of 176 (LB14).…”
Section: Alma Observationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3. The position uncertainty of the maser features is a function of both the synthesized beam θ 22 GHz and of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measured at each channel of the spectrum; this is ∆θ = 0.45 θ 22GHz S NR (Reid et al 1988). The peak flux of both, the strongest and one of the weakest spectral features in Fig 2, as well as the rms value measured at the source position in a line-free channel (rms=1.02 × 10 −2 Jy/beam) were used in order to estimate the SNR.…”
Section: High-velocity H 2 O Maser Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8, and the restored continuum maps (dual polarisation) have 1σ root mean square (rms) noise values of ∼0.2 mJy beam −1 . Hence, the statistical positional error, ∆θ stat θ maj θ min /(2S /N) (where θ maj and θ min are the major and minor axes of the beam; Reid et al 1988;Younger et al 2007), can be estimated to be about 0. 18/S 1.3 mm [ mJy beam −1 ], which is about 0.…”
Section: Source Samplementioning
confidence: 99%