2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dissolved methane recovery from treated sewage in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors: The energy demand, carbon footprint and financial cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other options for removing dissolved methane from effluents include oxidation of the effluent stream in a special reactor, the use of appropriately constructed biofilters or a downflow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor, or stripping and vacuuming. However, these are also associated with large energy inputs and low efficiency [136][137][138]. An interesting alternative for the removal of methane from wastewater streams may be hydraulic spray nozzles, which have demonstrated an efficiency of approximately 82% in removing methane from wastewater streams [136].…”
Section: Summary Of the Pre-treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other options for removing dissolved methane from effluents include oxidation of the effluent stream in a special reactor, the use of appropriately constructed biofilters or a downflow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor, or stripping and vacuuming. However, these are also associated with large energy inputs and low efficiency [136][137][138]. An interesting alternative for the removal of methane from wastewater streams may be hydraulic spray nozzles, which have demonstrated an efficiency of approximately 82% in removing methane from wastewater streams [136].…”
Section: Summary Of the Pre-treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Treatment cost The treatment cost of SS and RM is high, including the pretreatment, transportation, storage, and subsequent utilization, which increases the economic burden of TES technology's application [110][111][112]. In 2021, the cost of SS collection and treatment services in cities around the world varied significantly, with costs ranging from as low as 0.1 USD/m 3 to as high as 16 USD/m 3 [113]. RM costs 11.08 USD/ton, and the accumulation and storage of RM comes with a significant maintenance fee [7].…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%