2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Disruption and Dissolution of Directed Forgetting: Inhibitory Control of Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
145
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
145
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This position predicts the benefits for the forget group under circumstances permitting sufficient accumulation of PI in the remember group. However, with shorter or categorical lists, PI accumulates more slowly, which could explain why the benefits are sometimes relatively small (in comparison with the costs)-or even absent (Conway, Harries, Noyes, Racsma'ny, & Frankish, 2000). Published studies on directed forgetting employing lists of 12 items or fewer have not consistently shown benefits, whereas studies with longer lists (15 or more items) typically have reported reliable benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This position predicts the benefits for the forget group under circumstances permitting sufficient accumulation of PI in the remember group. However, with shorter or categorical lists, PI accumulates more slowly, which could explain why the benefits are sometimes relatively small (in comparison with the costs)-or even absent (Conway, Harries, Noyes, Racsma'ny, & Frankish, 2000). Published studies on directed forgetting employing lists of 12 items or fewer have not consistently shown benefits, whereas studies with longer lists (15 or more items) typically have reported reliable benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a dominant hypothesis to explain the cognitive changes associated with normal aging is that the cognitive resources available to perform mental operations decrease with age (Park & Hedden, 2001). Since intentional inhibitory control of memory can be considered to place a high demand on attentional resources (see, for example, Conway, Harries, Noyes, Racsma'ny, & Frankish, 2000, experiments 2, 3, and 4), we expected that elderly subjects' inhibitory performance would be reduced (in comparison to that of young subjects) in the three memory tasks requiring intentional suppression of some information, but that the two groups would perform similarly on tasks requiring unintentional inhibitory processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the inefficient inhibition hypothesis, it might be tempting to argue that young children have poor retrieval inhibition in general and that they should show not only poor directed forgetting, but poor retrievalinduced forgetting as well. In fact, because the two forms of inhibition appear to share a similar goal-facilitating the retrieval of relevant material by avoiding the interference of irrelevant material-and show other parallels as well (E. L. Bjork, R. A. Bjork, & M. C. Anderson, 1998;Conway, Harries, Noyes, Racsma'ny, & Frankish, 2000), they might become efficient at around the same age. Then, young children, such as first and third graders, should have problems in suppressing the interfering material during retrieval practice and, as a result, retrieval-induced forgetting, like directed forgetting, should be reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, directed forgetting occurs with intentional effort and is dependent on conscious control. It has been found to require a high amount of attentional capacity and to be reduced, or even eliminated, if a secondary task is introduced (Conway et al, 2000;Macrae, Bodenhausen, Milne, & Ford, 1997). This pattern suggests that directed forgetting depends to a large extent on controlled processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%