“…Following the inefficient inhibition hypothesis, it might be tempting to argue that young children have poor retrieval inhibition in general and that they should show not only poor directed forgetting, but poor retrievalinduced forgetting as well. In fact, because the two forms of inhibition appear to share a similar goal-facilitating the retrieval of relevant material by avoiding the interference of irrelevant material-and show other parallels as well (E. L. Bjork, R. A. Bjork, & M. C. Anderson, 1998;Conway, Harries, Noyes, Racsma'ny, & Frankish, 2000), they might become efficient at around the same age. Then, young children, such as first and third graders, should have problems in suppressing the interfering material during retrieval practice and, as a result, retrieval-induced forgetting, like directed forgetting, should be reduced.…”