Abstract:The disposition of bupivacaine and degree of analgesia following a 72 h interpleural infusion was investigated in 12 adult patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. The infusion regimen of an initial interpleural bolus dose of 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine HCI with adrenaline (1:200,000) followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 8 ml h-1 of 0.25% plain bupivacaine HCI was designed to achieve continuous post-operative pain relief for 72 h. In practice an additional bolus dose (identical to the first) adminis… Show more
“…Numerous studies demonstrate an acceptable safety profile with bupivacaine administered via the interpleural route [6, 8, 12–14, 16, 19]. In our study we used a conservative dosing regime and found no reported symptoms consistent with local anaesthetic toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Whilst there are sufficient patients to detect a clinically important difference in the primary endpoint, we are unable to detect the true incidence of complications from interpleural analgesia due to the relatively small sample size. Plasma levo‐bupivacaine levels were not evaluated as they have been well reported in numerous other studies [1, 6, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19, 26]. Although we found no reported symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity, it is possible that plasma levels may have demonstrated concentrations above the accepted safe range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The catheter was aspirated to exclude intravascular placement and a test dose of 2 ml levo‐bupivacaine 0.5% was administered. The patient was then placed in supine position and a loading dose of 20 ml levo‐bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:200 000 was administered, as previously described [1, 2, 6–8, 13, 16, 19]. To ensure even and optimum spread of the local anaesthetic solution, the patient was left in the supine position for 10 min [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derangements in coagulation after hepatic resection have favoured systemic multimodal analgesia in preference to neuraxial techniques as the preferred method for effective delivery of postoperative analgesia in many institutions. Several studies report the use of interpleural local anaesthetic solutions as an effective technique for analgesia following unilateral upper abdominal surgery [1–19]; however, it is unknown if interpleural analgesia is effective for patients receiving a right subcostal surgical incision with a midline abdominal incision extension (reverse‐L incision), a commonly used surgical incision for patients undergoing this procedure. For patients undergoing hepatic resection we think that interpleural analgesia is a beneficial analgesic adjunct to systemic morphine patient controlled analgesia.…”
We performed a prospective randomised trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of interpleural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatic resection. The control group (n = 25) received multimodal analgesia with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia; in addition, the interventional group (n = 25) received interpleural analgesia with a 20-ml loading dose of levo bupivacaine 0.5% followed by a continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125%. Outcome measures included pain intensity on movement using a visual analogue scale over 24 h, cumulative morphine and rescue analgesia requirements, patient satisfaction, hospital stay and all adverse events. Patients in the interpleural group were less sedated and none required treatment for respiratory depression compared to 6 (24%) in the control group (p< 0.01). Patients in the interpleural group also had lower pain scores during movement in the first 24 h. Patients' satisfaction, opioid requirements and duration of hospital stay were similar. We conclude that continuous interpleural analgesia augments intravenous morphine analgesia, decreases postoperative sedation and reduces respiratory depression after hepatic resection.
“…Numerous studies demonstrate an acceptable safety profile with bupivacaine administered via the interpleural route [6, 8, 12–14, 16, 19]. In our study we used a conservative dosing regime and found no reported symptoms consistent with local anaesthetic toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Whilst there are sufficient patients to detect a clinically important difference in the primary endpoint, we are unable to detect the true incidence of complications from interpleural analgesia due to the relatively small sample size. Plasma levo‐bupivacaine levels were not evaluated as they have been well reported in numerous other studies [1, 6, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19, 26]. Although we found no reported symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity, it is possible that plasma levels may have demonstrated concentrations above the accepted safe range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The catheter was aspirated to exclude intravascular placement and a test dose of 2 ml levo‐bupivacaine 0.5% was administered. The patient was then placed in supine position and a loading dose of 20 ml levo‐bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:200 000 was administered, as previously described [1, 2, 6–8, 13, 16, 19]. To ensure even and optimum spread of the local anaesthetic solution, the patient was left in the supine position for 10 min [20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derangements in coagulation after hepatic resection have favoured systemic multimodal analgesia in preference to neuraxial techniques as the preferred method for effective delivery of postoperative analgesia in many institutions. Several studies report the use of interpleural local anaesthetic solutions as an effective technique for analgesia following unilateral upper abdominal surgery [1–19]; however, it is unknown if interpleural analgesia is effective for patients receiving a right subcostal surgical incision with a midline abdominal incision extension (reverse‐L incision), a commonly used surgical incision for patients undergoing this procedure. For patients undergoing hepatic resection we think that interpleural analgesia is a beneficial analgesic adjunct to systemic morphine patient controlled analgesia.…”
We performed a prospective randomised trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of interpleural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatic resection. The control group (n = 25) received multimodal analgesia with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia; in addition, the interventional group (n = 25) received interpleural analgesia with a 20-ml loading dose of levo bupivacaine 0.5% followed by a continuous infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125%. Outcome measures included pain intensity on movement using a visual analogue scale over 24 h, cumulative morphine and rescue analgesia requirements, patient satisfaction, hospital stay and all adverse events. Patients in the interpleural group were less sedated and none required treatment for respiratory depression compared to 6 (24%) in the control group (p< 0.01). Patients in the interpleural group also had lower pain scores during movement in the first 24 h. Patients' satisfaction, opioid requirements and duration of hospital stay were similar. We conclude that continuous interpleural analgesia augments intravenous morphine analgesia, decreases postoperative sedation and reduces respiratory depression after hepatic resection.
“…[1][2][3] Toxicity is inconsistent as signs of toxicity have been reported in humans administered doses below the toxic dose, 11 but toxicity did not occur in others administered doses causing plasma concentrations to go higher than that considered toxic. 12,13 Absorption of local anesthetics after extravascular infiltration is dependent on the chemical nature of the drug, where the drug is administered, dose, concentration of the drug, vascularity of the infiltrated site, and the presence or absence of vasoactive drugs such as epinephrine in the anesthetic solution. 4 Extravascular administration of bupivacaine will undergo slow systemic absorption with rapid clearance; hence, plasma concentrations are not expected to reach toxic concentrations.…”
Intra-articular bupivacaine can be administered with small risk of reaching toxic plasma concentrations in dogs, though toxic concentrations may be approached. Caution should be exercised with multimodal bupivacaine administration because plasma drug concentration may rise higher than with single intra-articular injection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.