2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dispersion of 99Tc in the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean: a comparison of model results and observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For northern Norway, data from surface water observations at Hillesøy and NAOSIM results show good agreement. The same holds for the surface concentrations further upstream in the NCC and in the North Sea between 1996 and 1999 (Karcher et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For northern Norway, data from surface water observations at Hillesøy and NAOSIM results show good agreement. The same holds for the surface concentrations further upstream in the NCC and in the North Sea between 1996 and 1999 (Karcher et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This difference in levels and results from oceanographic 3-D modelling (Karcher et al, 2003a) give reasons to link the enhanced discharges from the nuclear reprocessing plant at Sellafield to the 99 Tc level changes observed in the Arctic. However, levels measured at Hillesøy on the coast of northern Norway, also in 2000 , are again five times higher than in Kongsfjorden at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a pioneering work by Prandle (1984), mixing and time-scales of the radionuclide 137 Cs on the European continental shelf was investigated. More recently, it has been shown that the current generation of OGCMs are capable of simulating the large-scale dispersion (Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean) of radionuclides from both European reprocessing plants and atmospheric fallout from nuclear bomb testing in a realistic manner (e.g., Karcher et al, 2004;Gao et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%