The Disparity and Dynamics of Social Distancing Behaviors in Japan: Investigation of Mobile Phone Mobility Data

Abstract

Background The availability of large-scale and fine-grained aggregated mobility data has allowed researchers to observe the dynamics of social distancing behaviors at high spatial and temporal resolutions. Despite the increasing attention paid to this research agenda, limited studies have focused on the demographic factors related to mobility, and the dynamics of social distancing behaviors have not been fully investigated. Objective This study aims to assist in designing and implementing public health policies by exploring how social distancing behaviors varied among various demographic groups over time. Methods We combined several data sources, including mobile tracking mobility data and geographical statistics, to estimate the visiting population of entertainment venues across demographic groups, which can be considered the proxy of social distancing behaviors. Next, we used time series analysis methods to investigate how voluntary and policy-induced social distancing behaviors shifted over time across demographic groups. Results Our findings demonstrate distinct patterns of social distancing behaviors and their dynamics across age groups. On the one hand, although entertainment venues’ population comprises mainly individuals aged 20-40 years, a more significant proportion of the youth has adopted social distancing behaviors and complied with policy implementations compared to older age groups. From this perspective, the increasing contribution to infections by the youth should be more likely to be attributed to their number rather than their violation of social distancing behaviors. On the other hand, although risk perception and self-restriction recommendations can induce social distancing behaviors, their impact and effectiveness appear to be largely weakened during Japan’s second state of emergency. Conclusions This study provides a timely reference for policymakers about the current situation on how different demographic groups adopt social distancing behaviors over time. On the one hand, the age-dependent disparity requires more nuanced and targeted mitigation strategies to increase the intention of elderly individuals to adopt mobility restriction behaviors. On the other hand, considering that the effectiveness of policy implementations requesting social distancing behaviors appears to decline over time, in extreme cases, the government should consider imposing stricter social distancing interventions, as they are necessary to promote social distancing behaviors and mitigate the transmission of COVID-19.

Physical distancing and emergency medical services utilization after self-harm in Korea during the early COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide quantitative study

“…Previous studies suggested that mobile phone mobility was useful for observing the dynamics of physical distancing behaviors related to COVID-19 spread [49][50][51]. A study conducted in Japan reported that the mobile phone mobility of an infection-risk-exposed group was associated with the number of infections with a lag time of 0-2 days, similar to the current study [52]. They used a cross-correlation function to examine the association between the moving average of the mobility index and the time-lagged daily infected cases.…”

A Personalized Avatar-Based Web Application to Help People Understand How Social Distancing Can Reduce the Spread of COVID-19: Cross-sectional, Observational, Pre-Post Study

“…Implementing distancing is only possible with public cooperation [ 9 , 10 ]. Such cooperation requires that people understand what they are being asked to do and why so that they adopt appropriate behaviors to help manage the pandemic [ 11 , 12 ].…”

Machine learning based regional epidemic transmission risks precaution in digital society

“…But it is difficult to get the reproduction number which can fit the epidemic transmission evolution perfectly in the real world. The deviation between theory and reality can be explained by the differences of individual behaviors 27 , 28 . The neglect of the micro heterogeneity may lead to misestimating the regional epidemic risks.…”