Abstract:The aim of this article is to illustrate how a discourse-oriented approach would open new theoretical and methodological perspectives to the study of community identity. Here outlined is the idea that community identity is discursively constructed by members in order to lend meaning to experience. An analysis of how community identity is constructed in subjects' discourse with reference to the local context is presented.
“…Discourse analysis is characterized by the adoption of an inductive approach which does not use categories defined a-priori (Colombo & Senatore, 2005). Rapley and Pretty (1999, p. 698) stress that the "employment of a-priori analytic category system is neglectful of local contexts and imposes theoretically-rather than locally-derived structures of meaning and relevance".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of community identity call for a more discursive rather than a functionalist approach (Colombo & Senatore, 2005;Dixon & Durrheim, 2000;Rapley & Pretty, 1999). Functionalists examine community identity from two main approaches: one grounded in a territorial-based conception while the other refers to a social-network relationship.…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical basis of a discursive perspective lies in semiotics and post-structuralism and from this perspective community identity is considered a socially constructed notion intended to give meaning to experience (Colombo & Senatore, 2005). A discursive perspective embeds a major shift from the view of language as a simple tool of description and medium of communication to understanding its role as social practice (Colombo & Senatore, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discursive perspective embeds a major shift from the view of language as a simple tool of description and medium of communication to understanding its role as social practice (Colombo & Senatore, 2005). "The 'quality' of place is more than aesthetic or affectional; it has a 'moral' dimension as well, which is expected for language as a component in the construction and maintenance of reality.…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The 'quality' of place is more than aesthetic or affectional; it has a 'moral' dimension as well, which is expected for language as a component in the construction and maintenance of reality. This alludes to understanding how people intersubjectively construct and negotiate their notion of community (Colombo & Senatore, 2005;Dixon & Durrheim, 2000;Rapley & Pretty, 1999;Stamper et al, 2000), as well as an understanding of the social structure of an island in order to understand the sites of conflict and hidden symbols used in different situations (Gibbons, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
This paper examines normative concepts of community identity expressed by inhabitants of Saaremaa Island, Estonia, via 20 interviews of permanent residents. Community identity is discursively constructed via interpretative repertoire to examine storylines used for constructing the sense of being part of an island community. Community identity relates to infrastructural aspects (roads, bridges); islandness being a key physical, philosophical and psychological component of the island's infrastructure, followed by more specific spatial units such as parish, village, neighbourhood and home. Each infrastructural unit involves a social network and physical environment related to a continuum of normative structure. Effects of a proposed bridge to the mainland influence respondent repertoire on changes of island community identity. Acceptance was the more dominant aspect of islander identity; acceptance by/of the environment determines who-is-who on the island. Normative components of acceptance included 'bodily experience' of individuals, 'community control' and 'community signsystems.' Constructions of 'we' as islanders distinct from the non-islanders provide a complex view of community identity.
“…Discourse analysis is characterized by the adoption of an inductive approach which does not use categories defined a-priori (Colombo & Senatore, 2005). Rapley and Pretty (1999, p. 698) stress that the "employment of a-priori analytic category system is neglectful of local contexts and imposes theoretically-rather than locally-derived structures of meaning and relevance".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of community identity call for a more discursive rather than a functionalist approach (Colombo & Senatore, 2005;Dixon & Durrheim, 2000;Rapley & Pretty, 1999). Functionalists examine community identity from two main approaches: one grounded in a territorial-based conception while the other refers to a social-network relationship.…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical basis of a discursive perspective lies in semiotics and post-structuralism and from this perspective community identity is considered a socially constructed notion intended to give meaning to experience (Colombo & Senatore, 2005). A discursive perspective embeds a major shift from the view of language as a simple tool of description and medium of communication to understanding its role as social practice (Colombo & Senatore, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discursive perspective embeds a major shift from the view of language as a simple tool of description and medium of communication to understanding its role as social practice (Colombo & Senatore, 2005). "The 'quality' of place is more than aesthetic or affectional; it has a 'moral' dimension as well, which is expected for language as a component in the construction and maintenance of reality.…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The 'quality' of place is more than aesthetic or affectional; it has a 'moral' dimension as well, which is expected for language as a component in the construction and maintenance of reality. This alludes to understanding how people intersubjectively construct and negotiate their notion of community (Colombo & Senatore, 2005;Dixon & Durrheim, 2000;Rapley & Pretty, 1999;Stamper et al, 2000), as well as an understanding of the social structure of an island in order to understand the sites of conflict and hidden symbols used in different situations (Gibbons, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Context Of Place Identitymentioning
This paper examines normative concepts of community identity expressed by inhabitants of Saaremaa Island, Estonia, via 20 interviews of permanent residents. Community identity is discursively constructed via interpretative repertoire to examine storylines used for constructing the sense of being part of an island community. Community identity relates to infrastructural aspects (roads, bridges); islandness being a key physical, philosophical and psychological component of the island's infrastructure, followed by more specific spatial units such as parish, village, neighbourhood and home. Each infrastructural unit involves a social network and physical environment related to a continuum of normative structure. Effects of a proposed bridge to the mainland influence respondent repertoire on changes of island community identity. Acceptance was the more dominant aspect of islander identity; acceptance by/of the environment determines who-is-who on the island. Normative components of acceptance included 'bodily experience' of individuals, 'community control' and 'community signsystems.' Constructions of 'we' as islanders distinct from the non-islanders provide a complex view of community identity.
Audio recordings of meetings of two community groups in a deprived inner-city area were analysed, using discursive psychological and conversation analytic techniques to explore situated enactments of 'community'. Participants situated themselves as members; of a geographical community; of an "imagined" community; and, of other constitutive communities. A sense of community was enacted through five interactional strategies: affirming moral codes, 'defending' other members, distinguishing insiders from outsiders, enacting empowerment and challenging institutions. Participants regularly employed emotional displays and affirmed moral positions, both to constitute 'community' and to take action in it. In so doing they worked up social capital and positioned community concerns in ways more reflective of their own situated values than of criminal law or government policy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.