1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(67)80125-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The discrete-ion effect in ionic double-layer theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the resultant adsorption free energy change is negative, and high-affinity adsorption of the surfactant moiety is facilitated. The use of localized charge density in above calculations (in place of the Braggs-William approximation of smeared out charge density) would, of course, lead to a larger value of electrostatic interaction (Levine et al, 1967). By the same token, counter-ion binding to surfactant head groups can significantly lower the repulsion between the head group and the surface and between head groups in the adsorbed layer (Hough and Rendall, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the resultant adsorption free energy change is negative, and high-affinity adsorption of the surfactant moiety is facilitated. The use of localized charge density in above calculations (in place of the Braggs-William approximation of smeared out charge density) would, of course, lead to a larger value of electrostatic interaction (Levine et al, 1967). By the same token, counter-ion binding to surfactant head groups can significantly lower the repulsion between the head group and the surface and between head groups in the adsorbed layer (Hough and Rendall, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, ions have different hydrated sizes so that the b-and d-planes are not strictly uniform layers. Our analysis does not include this detail (Levine et al 1967).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this arises from the fact that the model considers the (1) thickness of an order of magnitude as the molecular size, while it will be shown later, that the surface inhomogenous region is much thicker than this. After the Helmholtz description, the next model proposed was by Gouy & Chapman (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). In the Gouy-Chapman model the structure of the double layer is suggested to be determined by the intensity of the electric field associated with the adsorbed layer of film forming molecules, which will attract the oppositely charged ions from the bulk phase as close to the interface as possible through electrostatic forces.…”
Section: W635mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as a modified discrete (net) charge model is given in the following which was found to give a satisfactory analysis about the state of electrostatic charge image forces. Gouy-Chapman model: According to this model [15,17,18,19,20] satisfactory analyses of adsorbed and spread monolayers of simple charged amphiphiles for example n-alkyl sulfates etc. [15,17,18,19,20].…”
Section: Equation Of State For Charged Monolayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation