Crazy Talk 1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9119-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Discourse of Schizophrenic Speakers: A Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDI provides a measure of communication impairment (Docherty, 2005) and rates the number of speech unclarities, with an unclarity being any speech passage in which the meaning is sufficiently unclear to impair the overall meaning of the speech passage. The CDI was developed as an extension of a previous measure of unclear referents in speech that has been used frequently in previous schizophrenia research (Rochester & Martin, 1979) and the CDI has been used frequently in schizophrenia research as a measure of disordered speech (Kerns & Berenbaum, 2003; Docherty, 2005). It is associated with older measures of disorganized speech such as the Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC) scale (Docherty et al, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDI provides a measure of communication impairment (Docherty, 2005) and rates the number of speech unclarities, with an unclarity being any speech passage in which the meaning is sufficiently unclear to impair the overall meaning of the speech passage. The CDI was developed as an extension of a previous measure of unclear referents in speech that has been used frequently in previous schizophrenia research (Rochester & Martin, 1979) and the CDI has been used frequently in schizophrenia research as a measure of disordered speech (Kerns & Berenbaum, 2003; Docherty, 2005). It is associated with older measures of disorganized speech such as the Thought, Language, and Communication (TLC) scale (Docherty et al, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In schizophrenia, failures to establish coherence (clinically referred to as tangentiality and derailment) (Andreasen, 1979b; Earle-Boyer et al ., 1986; Mazumdar et al ., 1995) as well as referential cohesion (Docherty et al ., 1996; Rochester & Martin, 1979), during communication are amongst the most common clinical phenomena described. Despite these observations, there has been surprisingly little ERP work examining how schizophrenia patients build up meaning over more than one sentence.…”
Section: Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, given the robust evidence that schizophrenia patients, even those without thought disorder, fail to construct cohesive reference links during language production (Docherty et al, 1996; Rochester & Martin, 1979), patients might not fare so well when the referent is ambiguous (e.g. “Jack and Bill went to the store.…”
Section: Relationship Between Erp Abnormalities and Specific Symptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social process words have been indicated as predictors of total symptoms and metacognition in schizophrenia as well (Minor et al, in press). Finally, individuals with schizophrenia show differences in use of pronouns, identifying referents non-verbally when possible and using pronouns without the support needed to identify their referents (Rochester & Martin, 1979), as well as frequently referring to themselves during prolonged speech (Hoffman et al, 1985). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%