1997
DOI: 10.1512/iumj.1997.46.1277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dirichlet problem for second order parabolic operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that u vanishes continuously on a part of the boundary and we study the type of geometric assumptions we need to pose on the boundary in order to prove the Carleson estimate for (2), initially proved for equations of p-parabolic type by the author together with Ugo Gianazza and Sandro Salsa for cylindrical Lipschitz domains, in [1]. In the linear ( p = 2) case, the Carleson seems to be very useful, see for example [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18,20], thus it seems meaningful to establish it for p > 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that u vanishes continuously on a part of the boundary and we study the type of geometric assumptions we need to pose on the boundary in order to prove the Carleson estimate for (2), initially proved for equations of p-parabolic type by the author together with Ugo Gianazza and Sandro Salsa for cylindrical Lipschitz domains, in [1]. In the linear ( p = 2) case, the Carleson seems to be very useful, see for example [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18,20], thus it seems meaningful to establish it for p > 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that, while these authors work in Lipschitz cylinders, one can easily see that their proofs can be generalized to the setting of bounded NTA-cylinders. While the works Fabes, Safonov and Yuan completed, for linear uniformly parabolic equations, the line of research considered in this paper, contributions by other researchers are contained in [17], [23], [25], [33], [16], [21], [44]. For the elliptic versions of Theorem 1.1-Theorem 1.3 we refer to [18], [19], [20], and we emphasize that in the elliptic case the assumption λ ∈ A 2 (R n ) on the weight is sufficient for the validity of the corresponding versions of Theorem 1.1-Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the corresponding lemma in [44] can easily be adapted to prove Lemma 5.3. We omit further details.…”
Section: Remark 52mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these references many of the relevant ideas used in the proofs can also be found in [5], [6] and [19]. In particular, in [19] all relevant estimates are stated and proved, in Lip(1, 1/2) domains, in the general setting of second order parabolic equations in divergence form.…”
Section: Basic Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%