2020
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15408.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The direct-medical costs associated with interferon-based treatment for Hepatitis C in Vietnam

Abstract: Background: Injectable interferon-based therapies have been used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection since 1991. International guidelines have now moved away from interferon-based therapy towards direct-acting antiviral (DAA) tablet regimens, because of their superior efficacy, excellent side-effect profiles, and ease of administration. Initially DAA drugs were prohibitively expensive for most healthcare systems. Access is now improving through the procurement of low-cost, generic DAAs acquired through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 446 COVID-19 patients, early administration of inhaled IFNα2b produced more favorable clinical responses compared with lopinavir/ritonavir treatment alone and was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality ( Wang et al, 2020 ). While results from rIFN-based clinical trials are promising, one of the major disadvantages of this approach is its high cost, with direct medical costs ranging between $1,120 and $1,962 for the IFN treatment regimen and $2,156 and $5,887 for the PEG-IFN treatment regimen ( Nguyen et al, 2020 ). In addition, administration of rIFN has been shown to induce neutralizing antibody response against IFN that could render the therapy ineffective ( Giovannoni et al, 2002 ; Matsuda et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 446 COVID-19 patients, early administration of inhaled IFNα2b produced more favorable clinical responses compared with lopinavir/ritonavir treatment alone and was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality ( Wang et al, 2020 ). While results from rIFN-based clinical trials are promising, one of the major disadvantages of this approach is its high cost, with direct medical costs ranging between $1,120 and $1,962 for the IFN treatment regimen and $2,156 and $5,887 for the PEG-IFN treatment regimen ( Nguyen et al, 2020 ). In addition, administration of rIFN has been shown to induce neutralizing antibody response against IFN that could render the therapy ineffective ( Giovannoni et al, 2002 ; Matsuda et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence suggests that recombinant IFN (rIFN)–based intervention during the early stage of COVID-19 could provide desired clinical benefits in humans. However, rIFN therapy is costly ( Nguyen et al, 2020 ) and can be rendered ineffective by the induction of binding and/or neutralizing anti-drug antibodies ( Giovannoni et al, 2002 ; Matsuda et al, 2012 ). In contrast, SLR14 is highly manufacturable and can elicit a broad and diverse IFN response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of IFN, adherence and accessibility must be considered in scaling up IFN therapy to treat SARS-CoV-2. In Vietnam and Brazil, the weekly cost to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) with IFN therapy ranged from $25.32 to $109.07 USD, depending on the subtype of interferon used [ 28 , 29 ]. While IFN therapy regimens for SARS-COV-2 are shorter (4 weeks compared to 24–48 weeks), cost may remain a barrier to scale-up [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Vietnam and Brazil, the weekly cost to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) with IFN therapy ranged from $25.32 to $109.07 USD, depending on the subtype of interferon used [ 28 , 29 ]. While IFN therapy regimens for SARS-COV-2 are shorter (4 weeks compared to 24–48 weeks), cost may remain a barrier to scale-up [ 29 ]. IFN therapy is most effective during the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may further reduce costs associated with long recovery times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 446 COVID-19 patients, early administration of inhaled IFNα2b produced more favorable clinical responses compared to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) treatment alone and was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality 41 . While results from recombinant IFN-based clinical trials are promising, one of the major disadvantages of this approach is its high cost, with the direct medical cost of IFN treatment regimen to range between $1,120 and $1,962 and PEG-IFN treatment regimen between $2,156 and $5,887 42 . In addition, administration of recombinant IFN has been shown to induce neutralizing antibody response that could render the therapy ineffective 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%