2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Direct and Indirect Effects of Online Social Support, Neuroticism, and Web Content Internalization on the Drive for Thinness among Women Visiting Health-Oriented Websites

Abstract: One of the debates about media usage is the potential harmful effect that it has on body image and related eating disturbances because of its representations of the “ideal body”. This study focuses on the drive for thinness among the visitors of various health-oriented websites and online platforms because neither has yet been sufficiently studied in this context. Specifically, this study aims to bring more insight to the risk factors which can increase the drive for thinness in the users of these websites. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified ten studies (n = 3572) reporting data in the drive for thinness domain (Butkowski et al, 2019; Hendrickse et al, 2017; Hummel and Smith, 2015; Kim and Chock, 2015; Kvardova et al, 2020; Levinson et al, 2017; Meier and Gray, 2014; Simpson and Mazzeo, 2017; Tao, 2013; Tiggemann and Miller, 2010). In performing meta-analysis for the drive for thinness domain, we removed one of the studies that was highly influential (reporting an extremely positive Pearson correlation r = 0.51, Cook’s d > 2 S.D.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We identified ten studies (n = 3572) reporting data in the drive for thinness domain (Butkowski et al, 2019; Hendrickse et al, 2017; Hummel and Smith, 2015; Kim and Chock, 2015; Kvardova et al, 2020; Levinson et al, 2017; Meier and Gray, 2014; Simpson and Mazzeo, 2017; Tao, 2013; Tiggemann and Miller, 2010). In performing meta-analysis for the drive for thinness domain, we removed one of the studies that was highly influential (reporting an extremely positive Pearson correlation r = 0.51, Cook’s d > 2 S.D.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In performing meta-analysis for the drive for thinness domain, we removed one of the studies that was highly influential (reporting an extremely positive Pearson correlation r = 0.51, Cook’s d > 2 S.D. above mean of the cohort of studies, n = 445) and of weak quality (Kvardova et al, 2020). Moreover, this study used ‘web content internalization’ which was a quite dissimilar and appearance oriented PUI metric, which may explain the reported association.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations