1973
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(73)90129-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dipole expansion method for plasma simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since fluid elements are constrained on grids, one simple way to achieve this is to linearly interpolate the charge Q into adjacent discrete points. Considering the interpolation accuracy as well as the computational cost, we use the SUDS technique, which is the accelerated version 31 of the DEM, to interpolate the charge to the nearest grid point and its 4-neighbors while achieving the conservation of charge, as shown in Fig. 4͑b͒.…”
Section: Charge Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since fluid elements are constrained on grids, one simple way to achieve this is to linearly interpolate the charge Q into adjacent discrete points. Considering the interpolation accuracy as well as the computational cost, we use the SUDS technique, which is the accelerated version 31 of the DEM, to interpolate the charge to the nearest grid point and its 4-neighbors while achieving the conservation of charge, as shown in Fig. 4͑b͒.…”
Section: Charge Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives us a dipole expansion approximation and replaces the sum over particles by a sum over grid points as [22], [24] where (x g , y g ) is the NGP location. Finally, let us approximate the derivatives of using the central difference method over the adjacent grids (15) where Q NGP is the monopole charge contribution and D(ξ g ) is the dipole charge contributions Using this approximation based upon (15), we can obtain the charge density by summing the charge over the corresponding five neighboring grids on each fluid element.…”
Section: A Sudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do this by interpolating the charge in Fig. 3(a) to the nearest grid point (NGP) and its 4-neighbors using the subtracted dipole scheme (SUDS) [22] associated with the FSP technique [23], [24], which is described in Section III-A.…”
Section: A Charge Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain the discrete analog to the V 2 operator we use the 3-point two dimensional difference, that is, since The weighting scheme chosen in 1D may be interpreted as a dipole expansion of the charge density about the midpoint between cells [29]. In two dimensions a similar approach, but including a quadrupole term yields a scheme known as area weighting [5, p. 244].…”
Section: Difference Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%