1979
DOI: 10.1210/endo-105-4-1041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diphasic Effect of Vincristine on Glucose-Induced Insulin Secretion and Glucose Tolerance in the Intact Rat*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous 20 and present studies have demonstrated that (1) at 10 min after vincristine (0.15 mg/kg) treatment, glucose-induced insulin release was potentiated, but (2) at 60 and 120 min after vincristine treatment, glucose-induced insulin release was inhibited and glucose tolerance was impaired. In contrast, in the present study arginine-induced insulin release was not potentiated at 10 min nor inhibited at 60 and 120 min after vincristine treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previous 20 and present studies have demonstrated that (1) at 10 min after vincristine (0.15 mg/kg) treatment, glucose-induced insulin release was potentiated, but (2) at 60 and 120 min after vincristine treatment, glucose-induced insulin release was inhibited and glucose tolerance was impaired. In contrast, in the present study arginine-induced insulin release was not potentiated at 10 min nor inhibited at 60 and 120 min after vincristine treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Such a time-related potentiating effect of vincristine was also observed at 10 min after its administration in our previous in vivo studies. 20 If the integrity of microtubules is important for glucose-induced insulin release 14 -15 then the potentiating effect of vincristine on glucose-induced insulin release cannot be explained by microtubular disruption caused by vincristine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of microtubules in the intracellular transport has been derived from the observations that agents such as colchicine, vinblastine, and vincristine which are known to cause disruption of microtubular structures have been shown to inhibit catecholamine secretion from adrenal medulla (Poisner & Bernstein 1971), iodine secretion from the thyroid gland (Williams & Wolff 1970), pro¬ lactin secretion from the pituitary tumour cells in culture (Gautvik & Tashjian 1973) and insulin release in vitro from perfused pancreas and iso¬ lated perifused islets (Lacy et al 1968;Malaisse et al 1971Malaisse et al , 1975. We have also shown that colchi¬ cine and vincristine cause inhibition of glucoseinduced insulin release in vivo (Shah & Wongsurawat 1978;Shah et al 1979). However, our recent studies (Shah et al 1981(Shah et al , 1982 have shown that in the intact rat: 1) vincristine caused inhibi¬ tion of glucose-induced insulin release in the presence or absence of morphologic disruptions of the beta cell microtubules; and 2) a marked morphological alteration of the beta cell microtubules has failed to inhibit arginine-induced insulin release in the intact rat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For example, colchicine has been shown to affect concanavalin A receptors on white blood cells (Madyastha et al 1977). Dissociation of the effects of vincristine on the beta cell microtubular struc¬ tures and on the stimulated insulin release ob¬ served in our previous studies have shown that the effect of these agents on insulin release is mediated by mechanisms other than microtubular dis¬ ruption (Shah et al 1979(Shah et al , 1981(Shah et al , 1982a(Shah et al , 1982b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…3 " 5 We have also shown that vincristine and colchicine inhibit glucose-induced insulin release in vivo. 6 - 7 However, our recent studies 8 - 9 have shown that in the intact rat: (1) vincristine caused inhibition of glucose-induced insulin release in the presence or absence of morphologic disruption of the beta-cell microtubules; but, in contrast, (2) vincristine failed to inhibit arginine-induced insulin release either in the presence or absence of the beta-cell microtubular disruption. These observations suggested that in vivo vincristine may cause inhibition of glucose-induced insulin release by a mechanism other than microtubular disruption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%