2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dimensional structure of the emotional self‐efficacy scale (ESES)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that correlations between subscales were above .65 and correlations between subscales and the total Youth-ESES score were above .82. This is higher than was found for the adult ESES (Dacre Pool & Qualter, 2012a). Further, Cronbach's alpha for these four subscales for this sample of youth were good, ranging from .69 (perceiving emotions through facial expressions and body language) to .88 (using and managing own emotions).…”
Section: Confirming the Factor Structure Of The Youth-esesmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It shows that correlations between subscales were above .65 and correlations between subscales and the total Youth-ESES score were above .82. This is higher than was found for the adult ESES (Dacre Pool & Qualter, 2012a). Further, Cronbach's alpha for these four subscales for this sample of youth were good, ranging from .69 (perceiving emotions through facial expressions and body language) to .88 (using and managing own emotions).…”
Section: Confirming the Factor Structure Of The Youth-esesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Research also supports the idea that self-efficacy in relation to emotional information is distinct from actual skill, with evidence that ESE and ability EI are distinct constructs (Dacre Pool & Qualter, 2012a;Kirk et al, 2008;Nightingale et al, 2013).…”
Section: Why Is Ese Important?mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations