2023
DOI: 10.13189/ujaf.2023.110101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dilemma: Push-Down Accounting and the Conceptual Framework of Financial Accounting: A Case of Contradictions between Relevance and Reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the conceptual framework for financial accounting that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) constructed was deemed the most protracted and most expensive accounting project ever (Gore, 1992;Bryer, 1999) and needed to improve to function as a meta-theory for corporate reporting and accounting. Although the approach of the FASB's conceptual framework has been imitated and replicated in parts of the world-for example, the Saudi Organization for Certified Public Accountants (SOCPA) (Almoghaiwl, 2003;Alhomaid, 2009;Al-Adeem, 2020a), Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) 9 (Al-Adeem, 2020a), and the framework that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) developed to guide accounting practices-the FASB's conceptual framework has not been without issues and nor has it been rigorous and interrelated enough (e.g., Sterling, 1982;Anthony, 1983;Power, 1993;Miller et al, 1995;Macve, 1997;Zeff, 1999;Vorster, 2007) to become a complete (Belkaoui, 2004;Al-Adeem, 2023b) theory for financial accounting (Gaa, 1988;Wolk et al, 2004), which leaves questions open for research (Zeff, 1999). The challenge of internationalizing the FASB's conceptual framework (Al-Adeem, 2020b;Anthony, 1983;Belkaoui, 1995;Gambling & Karim, 1991;Karim, 2001;Solomons, 1986) means it is insufficient to become or substitute the accounting theory.…”
Section: Reconsidering the Enterprise Theory For Corporate Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even the conceptual framework for financial accounting that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) constructed was deemed the most protracted and most expensive accounting project ever (Gore, 1992;Bryer, 1999) and needed to improve to function as a meta-theory for corporate reporting and accounting. Although the approach of the FASB's conceptual framework has been imitated and replicated in parts of the world-for example, the Saudi Organization for Certified Public Accountants (SOCPA) (Almoghaiwl, 2003;Alhomaid, 2009;Al-Adeem, 2020a), Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI) 9 (Al-Adeem, 2020a), and the framework that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) developed to guide accounting practices-the FASB's conceptual framework has not been without issues and nor has it been rigorous and interrelated enough (e.g., Sterling, 1982;Anthony, 1983;Power, 1993;Miller et al, 1995;Macve, 1997;Zeff, 1999;Vorster, 2007) to become a complete (Belkaoui, 2004;Al-Adeem, 2023b) theory for financial accounting (Gaa, 1988;Wolk et al, 2004), which leaves questions open for research (Zeff, 1999). The challenge of internationalizing the FASB's conceptual framework (Al-Adeem, 2020b;Anthony, 1983;Belkaoui, 1995;Gambling & Karim, 1991;Karim, 2001;Solomons, 1986) means it is insufficient to become or substitute the accounting theory.…”
Section: Reconsidering the Enterprise Theory For Corporate Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, accounting is one of the best anthropological developments (Chambers, 1984) and the most trusted profession in the world (Moehrle et al, 2006, xxii, p. 6). Accounting has emerged in response to society's needs (Al-Adeem, 2017;2020a;2020b;2022a;Al-Adeem & Fogarty, 2010;Al-Hazzani & Al-Adeem, 2020;Anderson, 1977;Belkaoui, 1995;Boedker & Chua, 2013;Burchell et al, 1980;Chambers, 1960;1984;Chatfield, 1977;Cowan, 1968;DR Scott, 1926;Hatfield, 1924;Hopwood, 1987;Lehman, 2005;Littleton, 1966Littleton, /1981Merino, 1993; Montgomery as cited in Nelson, 1949;Vatter, 1963;Yamey, 1947). Adapting to new roles (Montgomery in the Foreword to Edward Peragallo's Origin and Evolution of Double Entry Bookkeeping, as cited in Nelson, 1949: 357) is the nature of accounting, and accounting continuity (Littleton & Zimmerman, 1962;Alshirazi, 1990) is assured by the malleable nature of the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accounting research experienced a tradeoff between the two types (Al-Adeem [3]) creating a demand for a theoretical ground. Such a demand has been moved because to date, accounting has not developed its own theory [1][2][3]9,10,22,23,29,37,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Virtually, a paradigm shift indicates a development in a science (Kuhn 1996).…”
Section: Viewing the Development Of Accounting Research Paradigmaticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the balance of matters. Strengthening the independence of the external auditor, even in the presence of Sikka et al, 1989Baker, 1993Mitchell et al, 2001;Sikka, 2001Sikka, , 2002 Al-Adeem, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c2019a, 2019b2019c;2021a;2021b;2023a, 2023b2023c;2023d;2023e;2024;Al-Adeem & Fogarty, 2010;Alharbi & Al-Adeem, 2022;Al-Hazzani & Al-Adeem, 2020;Alhomaid, 2009;Alshiban & Al-Adeem, 2022;Beaver, 2002;Belkaoui, 2004;Brearey, & Al-Adeem, 2019;Chatfield, 1977;Coetsee, 2010;Gaffikin, 1987;García, 2017;Ijiri, 1967;King, 2006;Lee, 2009a;Statement on Accounting Theory and Theory Acceptance (SATTA) , 1977 Bayou et al, 2011;Briloff, 1966Briloff, , 1981Chambers & Wolnizer, 1991;Cowan, 1965;Conway, 2020;Hines, 1988;Houghton, 1987;Kirk, 2008;Lee, 2006aLee, , 2006bLee, , 2009b…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%