The dilemma of pest suppression in the conservation of endangered species

Abstract

In the conservation of endangered species, suppression of a population of one native species to benefit another poses challenges. Examples include predator control and nest parasite reduction. Less obvious is the control of blood‐feeding arthropods. We conducted a case study of the effect of native black flies (Simulium spp.) on reintroduced Whooping Cranes (Grus americana). Our intent was to provide a science‐driven approach for determining the effects of blood‐feeding arthropods on endangered vertebrates and identifying optimal management actions for managers faced with competing objectives. A multiyear experiment demonstrated that black flies reduce nest success in cranes by driving incubating birds off their nests. We used a decision‐analytic approach to develop creative management alternatives and evaluate trade‐offs among competing objectives. We identified 4 management objectives: establish a self‐sustaining crane population, improve crane well‐being, maintain native black flies as functional components of the ecosystem, and minimize costs. We next identified potential management alternatives: do nothing, suppress black flies, force crane renesting to occur after the activity period of black flies, relocate releases of cranes, suppress black flies and relocate releases, or force crane renesting and relocate releases. We then developed predictions on constructed scales of 0 (worst‐performing alternative) to 1 (best‐performing alternative) to indicate how alternative actions performed in terms of management objectives. The optimal action depended on the relative importance of each objective to a decision maker. Only relocating releases was a dominated alternative, indicating that it was not optimal regardless of the relative importance of objectives. A rational decision maker could choose any other management alternative we considered. Recognizing that decisions involve trade‐offs that must be weighed by decision makers is crucial to identifying alternatives that best balance multiple management objectives. Given uncertainty about the population dynamics of blood‐feeding arthropods, an adaptive management approach could offer substantial benefits.

Ecological and Societal Services of Aquatic Diptera

“…This objective is often counter to the need to control fly populations, such as those that are involved in transmitting disease agents. Extracting the beneficial attributes of aquatic Diptera that also can be pests or vectors depends on wise and adaptive management that views the system holistically [150].…”