2005
DOI: 10.4414/smi.21.00101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The digital pen and paper technology: implementation and use in an existing clinical information system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of collaborative efforts in managing infectious diseases in Tanzania and other southern African countries is not new. The emergence of innovative and appropriate technologies, approaches and tools for participatory epidemiology and disease surveillance (Hussain et al 2005;Jost et al 2007), such as the use of mobile technologies (Aanensen et al 2009;Despont-Gros et al 2005) is likely to mean that infectious disease surveillance can be improved in future. This will contribute to better public health and economic and social stability in Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of collaborative efforts in managing infectious diseases in Tanzania and other southern African countries is not new. The emergence of innovative and appropriate technologies, approaches and tools for participatory epidemiology and disease surveillance (Hussain et al 2005;Jost et al 2007), such as the use of mobile technologies (Aanensen et al 2009;Despont-Gros et al 2005) is likely to mean that infectious disease surveillance can be improved in future. This will contribute to better public health and economic and social stability in Africa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates that care providers' acceptance to e-Partograph were lower as of the envisioned penetration. It also known that in a hospital and clinical settings, the deployment of new digital data recording technologies often faces poor acceptance by clinicians [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transfer from analogous data to digital data normally requires an additional step after patient contact, which is the manual typing of data into a local computer system, or web-based front-end of a client, or server-driven hospital information system, or a registry. This additional step has a negative effect on data quality, performance and process costs, as it is both time consuming and additional effort for the data recorder, without any instantaneously recognizable advantages [15]. It also introduces an additional possibility for data errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the approval time was less than 2 minutes. Data quality for core data was greater than 95% and superior to handwritten documentation, and both checkbox and numerical data fields were correctly recorded at 99.8% [15-18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%