1984
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2738(84)90141-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diffusion coefficient of carbon in cementite, Fe3C, at 450°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental values for the (temperature dependence of the) parabolic growth constant were determined. These results were evaluated in terms of an ''apparent'' activation energy for cementite-layer growth and discussed with reference to previous work on the kinetics of cementite (layer) growth [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The discrepancy between the results of the present work and the literature data are discussed in terms of thermodynamic consequences of the different gas atmospheres used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 38%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental values for the (temperature dependence of the) parabolic growth constant were determined. These results were evaluated in terms of an ''apparent'' activation energy for cementite-layer growth and discussed with reference to previous work on the kinetics of cementite (layer) growth [4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The discrepancy between the results of the present work and the literature data are discussed in terms of thermodynamic consequences of the different gas atmospheres used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…The discrepancy between the presently determined Q app = 109 ± 12 kJ/mol and Q D = 154 kJ/mol [18] and Q D = 163-185 kJ/mol [13,14] implies that Q f eff must be negative.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the ''Apparent'' Activation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…При этом учитывался тот факт, что при c ≈ 0.10 аустенит экспериментально не наблюдается [45]. Ко-эффициенты диффузии углерода в фазах были вы-браны D α /D γ = D γ /D θ = 10 в качественном согла-сии с данными [46,47]. Параметр k c , определяющий ширину межфазной границы, определяли из условия …”
Section: приложение параметризация моделиunclassified
“…[17] and [36]. These differences can be understood recognising that the nitrogen concentration in the ferrite substrate, The activation energy of nitrogen diffusion through cementite (here determined as 65 ± 2 kJ/mol) is relatively low as compared to real or "apparent" activation energies for carbon diffusion through cementite which are in the range of 110 -185 kJ/mol [10,[42][43][44], and for nitrogen diffusion in iron nitrides, which are in the range of 92 -144 kJ/mol [40,41,45]. The activation energy for nitrogen diffusion in cementite appears to be as low as the activation energy for nitrogen (or carbon) diffusion in ferrite, which is about 78 -79 kJ/mol [29,37].…”
Section: Simulation Of Nitrogen Concentration-depth Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%