1942
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1942.tb01022.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Differential Threshold for the Subjective Judgement of the Elastic and Plastic Properties of Soft Bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1942
1942
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is substantially better than reported in [4], which is surprising since they used very similar materials. It is more comparable to the results reported in [2] and [3]. But, more importantly, the thresholds for the three stimulus configurations have the same linear dependence on the reference hardness.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is substantially better than reported in [4], which is surprising since they used very similar materials. It is more comparable to the results reported in [2] and [3]. But, more importantly, the thresholds for the three stimulus configurations have the same linear dependence on the reference hardness.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The value of 0.15 for the Weber fraction found in this experiment is similar to what was found by Scott-Blair and Coppen [2], [3] ð$0:13Þ, but considerably smaller than the value of $0:3 reported by Freyberger and Färber [4]. The compliance ranges in that and the present experiment are quite similar, so that cannot be an explanation for the discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrimination of compressibility, compliance or hardness has been investigated in a number of ways [2,3,4,5,6,7], that are not all easily compared. One measure that can be used for comparing these studies is the Weber fraction, defined as the ratio between the discrimination threshold and the stimulus intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest way of doing this is to use the rank orders obtained from the mean positions instead of the mean positions themselves. In this way we calculated the average deviation for each separate category and found for e, 1-29, for n, 1-69-and for r, [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: (B) Firmnessmentioning
confidence: 99%