Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential regulation of osteoblast and osteoclast activity by surface topography of hydroxyapatite coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
138
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
9
138
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PRF incorporation appeared to increase the surface roughness of the scaffolds, which may promote cellular adhesion. 44 The nonprinted and printed BCP/PVA/PRF scaffolds had lower contact angles than the nonprinted and printed BCP/PVA scaffolds, respectively (P,0.05; Figure 2K), demonstrating that the incorporation of PRF improved the hydrophilicity of the scaffolds. The 3D printed BCP/PVA and BCP/PVA/PRF scaffolds (49.6 and 54.7%) had significantly higher total porosities than the nonprinted BCP/PVA and BCP/PVA/PRF scaffolds (1.5 and 6.1%, P,0.05), respectively ( Figure 2L), confirming that the 3D printing process increased the porosity of the scaffolds, which may enhance cellular penetration and distribution to facilitate vascularization.…”
Section: Porosity (%)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…PRF incorporation appeared to increase the surface roughness of the scaffolds, which may promote cellular adhesion. 44 The nonprinted and printed BCP/PVA/PRF scaffolds had lower contact angles than the nonprinted and printed BCP/PVA scaffolds, respectively (P,0.05; Figure 2K), demonstrating that the incorporation of PRF improved the hydrophilicity of the scaffolds. The 3D printed BCP/PVA and BCP/PVA/PRF scaffolds (49.6 and 54.7%) had significantly higher total porosities than the nonprinted BCP/PVA and BCP/PVA/PRF scaffolds (1.5 and 6.1%, P,0.05), respectively ( Figure 2L), confirming that the 3D printing process increased the porosity of the scaffolds, which may enhance cellular penetration and distribution to facilitate vascularization.…”
Section: Porosity (%)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One possible 10µm 7 explanation is that the high roughness of the substrate prevented the OC from sealing the substrate, thus hampering the degradation process, as described in previous works. 6,25 One aspect worth noticing is the fact that the microstructure of the pristine material was revealed intact beneath the cell, thus confirming that there was no damage associated to FIB-sectioning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…5 Several pre-clinical studies of bone substitutes have focused on these early interactive stages and, particularly, on the biomaterial-osteoclasts interactions in terms of OC adhesion, gene expression and evaluation of resorption pits. [6][7][8] Usually, these investigations require, on the one hand, the study of OC differentiation and activity, such as gene expression or marker identification, and on the other hand, the evaluation of morphological changes in the substrates, which implies staining or removal of cells in order to visualize the underlying structure. RANKL-containing cell culture medium (DMEM) from human osteoblast supernatants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant aspect is that not only the chemistry, but also the surface topography was different in the two robocasted scaffolds. There is extensive literature that indicates that different cell responses can be expected towards hydroxyapatite substrates with varying micro and nanoscale surface topographies 37,42 as the ones developed in the present study, and work in this direction is under way in our laboratories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%