The Differential Learning Achievements of Constructivist Technology-Intensive Learning Environments as Compared with Traditional Ones: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Different learning environments provide different learning experiences and ought to serve different achievement goals. We hypothesized that constructivist learning environments lead to the attainment of achievements that are consistent with the experiences that such settings provide and that more traditional settings lead to the attainments of other kinds of achievement in accordance with the experiences they provide. A meta-analytic study was carried out on 32 methodologically-appropriate experiments in which these 2 settings were compared. Results supported 1 of our hypotheses showing that overall constructivist learning environments are more effective than traditional ones (ES = .460) and that their superiority increases when tested against constructivist-appropriate measures (ES = .902). However, contrary to expectations, traditional settings did not differ from constructivist ones when traditionally-appropriate measures were used. A number of possible interpretations are offered among them the possibility that traditional settings have come to incorporate some constructivist elements. This possibility is supported by other findings of ours such as smaller effect sizes for more recent studies and for longer lasting periods of instruction.For the last three decades numerous kinds of technology-intensive learning environments have been developed and their effectiveness repeatedly compared *This article is based on a Masters dissertation submitted to the University of Haifa Faculty of Education by the first author. The second author directed the work.

Family Reflections: A Promising Therapeutic Program Designed to Treat Severely Alienated Children and Their Family System

“…The following 3 years consisted of keeping up-to-date on empirical research and clinical literature on high-conflict divorce, alienation and estrangement (e.g., Baker, 2005, Baker & Darnall, 2007Bernet, 2010;Gardner et al, 2006;Warshak, 2010a), the link between child psychological abuse and child neurodevelopment (e.g., Siegel, D.J., 2012;Teicher, 2002;Yates, 2007), and best practices for teaching children through the use of multimedia (e.g., Brunye, Taylor, Rapp, & Spiro, 2006;Deimann & Keller, 2006;Rosen & Salomon, 2007). Additionally, the founder researched two wellknown reunification programs-Family Bridges: A Workshop for Troubled and Alienated Parent-Child Relationships, originally developed by Randy Rand and later refined by Rand and Warshak (Kelly, 2010;Warshak, 2010a, b;Warshak & Otis, 2010), and the Overcoming Barriers Program (Sullivan, Ward, & Deutsch, 2010).…”

Making Student Thinking Visible through a Concept Map in Computer-Based Assessment of Critical Thinking

“…Qualitatively different learning environments offer different kinds of assessment experiences and thus serve different educational goals. Research shows that computer-based constructivist learning environments can more effectively promote higher-order thinking skills, learning motivation, and teamwork than can traditional settings (Rosen & Salomon, 2007). Just as technology and learning sciences play an essential role in helping to develop more effective learning practices, they also can provide key improvements in assessment (Bennett, 1999;Bennett, Persky, Weiss, & Jenkins, 2007;Pellegrino, Chudowsky, & Glaser, 2001;Tucker, 2009).…”

Artefact generation in second life with case-based reasoning

“…Feedback obtained from users substantially enriches the design process, thus leading to innovative ideas and unexpected results (Rosen and Salomon 2007). This gives the developers the necessary information for improvements towards high-quality learning materials matching the needs in different learning situations (Meisalo 2005).…”