1994
DOI: 10.1210/me.8.9.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differential capacity of glucocorticoids and progestins to alter chromatin structure and induce gene expression in human breast cancer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luciferase assays were performed as described previously [17]. The protein concentration of each extract was determined by BCA assay (Pierce).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luciferase assays were performed as described previously [17]. The protein concentration of each extract was determined by BCA assay (Pierce).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the promoter must be remodelled for transcriptional activation 7,10 and that the SWI-SNF/hBRG1 complex is needed for GR trans-activation 11-13 , we tested for interaction between the GR and the hBRG1 complex. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that glucocorticoids promote a hormone-dependent association of the GR with the hBRG1 complex (Fig.…”
Section: The Assembly Of Transcriptional Regulatory Dna Sequences Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, the ability of GR versus PR to activate transcription is highly cell-type specific and may depend on both the relative order of a given promoter and the remodeling capability (both histone modification and ATPase driven) the receptor is able to recruit [93, 98, 99, 101]. All SRs require SWI/SNF when promoter remodeling is needed, and each has been shown to physically interact with the SWI/SNF complex [104, 112].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation that in T47D/A1-2 breast cancer cells expressing both GR and PR, GR activation leads to transcriptional upregulation from both stable and transiently transfected templates while PR activation leads only to increased transcription from transiently traransfected templates reveals a major difference between GR and PR activity [79, 101]. Nuclease hypersensitivity analyses of the promoter following hormone induction shows reduced remodeling correlates with impaired function in the case of PR signaling [99, 101]. Despite weak remodeling capability, PR is capable of inhibiting GR activation when both hormones and receptors are present [101].…”
Section: Steroid Hormone Signaling and Chromatin Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation