2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The different role of trait empathy and state social exclusion empathy on subsequent feelings about gambling outcome:Evidence from event-related potentials and time-frequency decompositions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 93 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…describe empathy as a malleable and highly flexible phenomenon. In line with this perspective, extraneous factors that have been shown to modulate an individual’s empathic state include positive or negative daily affect ( Nezlek et al ., 2001 ), interpersonal closeness ( Batson et al , 2002 ; Cialdini et al, 1997 ; Simpson et al ., 1995 ; Lyu et al ., 2022 ), length of interaction ( Powell and Roberts, 2017 ), and the size of the interaction group ( Davis et al ., 1996 ). Others suggest that motivation to respond empathically or avoid empathic responding can vary as a function of the empathizer’s characteristics as well as situational factors ( Cikara et al ., 2014 ; Zaki, 2014 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…describe empathy as a malleable and highly flexible phenomenon. In line with this perspective, extraneous factors that have been shown to modulate an individual’s empathic state include positive or negative daily affect ( Nezlek et al ., 2001 ), interpersonal closeness ( Batson et al , 2002 ; Cialdini et al, 1997 ; Simpson et al ., 1995 ; Lyu et al ., 2022 ), length of interaction ( Powell and Roberts, 2017 ), and the size of the interaction group ( Davis et al ., 1996 ). Others suggest that motivation to respond empathically or avoid empathic responding can vary as a function of the empathizer’s characteristics as well as situational factors ( Cikara et al ., 2014 ; Zaki, 2014 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%