Quartz Cementation in Sandstones 2000
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304237.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Different Processes Involved in the Mechanism of Pressure Solution in Quartz‐Rich Rocks and their Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sheppard, 2002), nevertheless, it is not generally agreed whether the pressure dissolution of chalk is mainly controlled by stress at the grain contacts or by temperature dependent diffusion and precipitation (Renard et al, 2000). Bjørkum (1996) and Bjørkum et al (1998) interpreted petrographic data as indicating a temperature control on stylolite formation in quartzose sandstones, and supported their conclusion by referring to geochemical modeling data by Oelkers et al Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Sheppard, 2002), nevertheless, it is not generally agreed whether the pressure dissolution of chalk is mainly controlled by stress at the grain contacts or by temperature dependent diffusion and precipitation (Renard et al, 2000). Bjørkum (1996) and Bjørkum et al (1998) interpreted petrographic data as indicating a temperature control on stylolite formation in quartzose sandstones, and supported their conclusion by referring to geochemical modeling data by Oelkers et al Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Once dissolution precipitation occurs in presence of external stresses, such as in compaction studies (e.g. Renard et al 2000;Miyakawa and Kawabe 2014), we refer to pressure solution. It is a well study process that can be driven not only by chemical changes but above all by deformation within the whole upper crust (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At zero porosity, we assume that A c ! pd 2 /z, where z is the average grain packing coordination number, d is the average grain diameter and pd 2 is the equivalent surface area of a spherical grain of diameter d. At intermediate porosities of 5 -35%, an analysis of the geometry of a simple cubic, or body-centered cubic pack of initially spherical grains compacting isotropically by pressure solution [Gundersen et al, 2002;Renard et al, 2000Renard et al, , 1999 shows that the relation between contact area and porosity is well described by the relation…”
Section: Microstructural Model and Associated State Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%