2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The different impacts of SO2 and SO3 on Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SO 2 exposure has a drastic impact on the standard SCR of NO x at temperatures below 250 • C, with conversion decreasing by as much as 45% at 200 • C. This is significant at the lowest operating temperatures observed in marine diesel engines where exhaust temperatures can dip as low as 200 • C. Both aged samples exhibit less than 60% NO x conversion at this temperature, which is well below the conversion required to meet the MARPOL Tier II standards. Furthermore, the lower sulfur exposure temperature results in the most significant deactivation, which agrees with results obtained by Cheng et al [12] who found that NO x conversion decreases as the sulfur aging temperature is decreased, even for low levels of SO 2 exposure. Mild desulfation for only 10 min at 500 • C is not adequate to recover standard SCR performance, but after 30 min of desulfation at 600 • C the NO x conversion is comparable to a de-greened catalyst.…”
Section: Bench Flow Reactor Performance Evaluationssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SO 2 exposure has a drastic impact on the standard SCR of NO x at temperatures below 250 • C, with conversion decreasing by as much as 45% at 200 • C. This is significant at the lowest operating temperatures observed in marine diesel engines where exhaust temperatures can dip as low as 200 • C. Both aged samples exhibit less than 60% NO x conversion at this temperature, which is well below the conversion required to meet the MARPOL Tier II standards. Furthermore, the lower sulfur exposure temperature results in the most significant deactivation, which agrees with results obtained by Cheng et al [12] who found that NO x conversion decreases as the sulfur aging temperature is decreased, even for low levels of SO 2 exposure. Mild desulfation for only 10 min at 500 • C is not adequate to recover standard SCR performance, but after 30 min of desulfation at 600 • C the NO x conversion is comparable to a de-greened catalyst.…”
Section: Bench Flow Reactor Performance Evaluationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More recently, sulfur exposure has been studied on small-pore zeolites utilizing SO x concentrations of up to 200 ppm in simulated diesel exhaust, and it was found that SO x can have a significant impact on the NO x reduction activity of smallpore Cu-zeolite catalysts at evaluation temperatures below 300 • C [12][13][14]. The primary degradation mechanisms attributed to the presence of sulfur are the formation of ammonium sulfate at temperatures less than 300 • C and the adsorption of SO x on key sites active for SCR along with the formation of copper sulfate species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For practical implementation of a low temperature CO oxidation catalyst, the catalyst preferably maintain its initial activity against severe operating conditions, such as changing gas temperature, steam, high and low space velocities, and traces of SO 2 [22][23][24]. However, the effects of these conditions are rarely reported over Pd/CeO 2 based catalysts that are often synthesized via the aforementioned rather complex procedures [3,8,9,[11][12][13][14]21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VO x was supported onto the corresponding unique TiO 2 structure following the procedure reported in the literature272829303132. However, the supporting VO x catalyst up to 5 wt% resulted in the lower surface area of 105 m 2 g −1 with 0.19 ccg −1 because of the high calcination temperature at 773 K though the sample still contained large surface area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%