2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The different effects on cranial and trunk neural crest cell behaviour following exposure to a low concentration of alcohol in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When cultured in ethanol's presence (10.9 or 150 mM), fewer neural crest cells emerge from cranial-derived explants (Czarnobaj et al, 2014). The cranial neural crest cells (CNCs) travel significantly shorter distances (50% of control values) and their migration is less directional, again with more retrograde movements (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002;Czarnobaj et al, 2014). At low ethanol (10.9 mM) only the migration of cranial populations was impaired (Czarnobaj et al, 2014), and it took substantially higher ethanol levels (150 mM) to impair trunk neural crest migration (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002).…”
Section: Effects On Neural Crest Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When cultured in ethanol's presence (10.9 or 150 mM), fewer neural crest cells emerge from cranial-derived explants (Czarnobaj et al, 2014). The cranial neural crest cells (CNCs) travel significantly shorter distances (50% of control values) and their migration is less directional, again with more retrograde movements (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002;Czarnobaj et al, 2014). At low ethanol (10.9 mM) only the migration of cranial populations was impaired (Czarnobaj et al, 2014), and it took substantially higher ethanol levels (150 mM) to impair trunk neural crest migration (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002).…”
Section: Effects On Neural Crest Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cranial neural crest cells (CNCs) travel significantly shorter distances (50% of control values) and their migration is less directional, again with more retrograde movements (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002;Czarnobaj et al, 2014). At low ethanol (10.9 mM) only the migration of cranial populations was impaired (Czarnobaj et al, 2014), and it took substantially higher ethanol levels (150 mM) to impair trunk neural crest migration (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002). Importantly, this abnormal migration persisted for at least 24 hr following ethanol removal, suggesting that ethanol caused lasting changes in neural crest migratory capacity (Rovasio and Battiato, 2002).…”
Section: Effects On Neural Crest Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prenatal ethanol exposure at a variety of developmental stages has been shown to disturb many aspects of neural crest development. Even low doses of ethanol exposure (equivalent to one drink) significantly altered the cellular activity of cranial and trunk neural crest cells from Xenopus embryos assayed in vitro (Czarnobaj et al, ). Two of the many mechanisms that may alter NCC number and migratory behavior are discussed next.…”
Section: Teratogens Disturb Neural Crest Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, cranial NCCs explants were exposed to low concentrations of ethanol. This treatment resulted in an initial delay in the number of NCCs emigrating from these explants, associated with a reduction in the overall distance covered by individual cells [42], again consistent with a role of ethanol in disrupting NCCs migration.…”
Section: Craniofacial Disorders Modeled In Xenopusmentioning
confidence: 65%