2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The differences in measured prostate material properties between probing and unconfined compression testing methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the example shown, the maximum amplitude of particle displacement was 1 mm, at the contact surface between emitter and urethral wall. The maximum shear strain generated was 4.5%, which is within the linear elastic regime for most soft tissues, this is 5–10%, and is below the irreversible damage threshold [ 65 ]. The amplitude of the wave rapidly decreased due to attenuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example shown, the maximum amplitude of particle displacement was 1 mm, at the contact surface between emitter and urethral wall. The maximum shear strain generated was 4.5%, which is within the linear elastic regime for most soft tissues, this is 5–10%, and is below the irreversible damage threshold [ 65 ]. The amplitude of the wave rapidly decreased due to attenuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%