2019
DOI: 10.19166/nc.v7i1.2224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Difference of Pain Scale Using Numeric Rating Scale and Visual Analog Scale in Post-Operative Patients

Abstract: Post-operative pain is acute and subjective therefore the perceived pain intensity will be different. In one of the western Indonesia Hospitals in measuring the pain threshold using 2 tools namely Numeric Rating Scale and Wong Baker Face. Measurement of the pain intensity can be done with NRS and VAS scale. The objective of this research was to identify the difference of pain scale using the NRS and VAS scale in post-operative patients. The research method was descriptive quantitative using comparative approac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, to measure the level of dysmenorrhea pain, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used. The scale is as follows: 0= no pain; 1-3= Mild pain; 4-6= Moderate Pain; 7-10= Severe Pain (Paluwih et al, 2019). All obtained measurement data were then analyzed by using STATA Statistical software: Release 17 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) to administer the univariate, bivariate, and multivariate test methods (Saei et al, 2020;Verket et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, to measure the level of dysmenorrhea pain, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used. The scale is as follows: 0= no pain; 1-3= Mild pain; 4-6= Moderate Pain; 7-10= Severe Pain (Paluwih et al, 2019). All obtained measurement data were then analyzed by using STATA Statistical software: Release 17 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) to administer the univariate, bivariate, and multivariate test methods (Saei et al, 2020;Verket et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%