2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The difference in thermal and mechanical stabilities of austenite between carbon- and nitrogen-added metastable austenitic stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thin-foil specimens were prepared using focused ion beam and a dualbeam instrument FEI Nova 600. The SFEs can be estimated using thermodynamic modelling by calculating the molar Gibbs free energy difference between γ and ε (∆ → ) and adding the contributions of the interfacial energy of the γ/ε interface ′ [18,44,45] and the strain energy ( ):…”
Section: Data Analysis For Strain/stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The thin-foil specimens were prepared using focused ion beam and a dualbeam instrument FEI Nova 600. The SFEs can be estimated using thermodynamic modelling by calculating the molar Gibbs free energy difference between γ and ε (∆ → ) and adding the contributions of the interfacial energy of the γ/ε interface ′ [18,44,45] and the strain energy ( ):…”
Section: Data Analysis For Strain/stress Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the steel with the lowest α' fraction but still about 10%. Hence, it indicates that α' can form at intersections of shear bands, twin boundaries and dislocation walls [18,55] without ε. This could be due to that α' can form at less potent sites with the additional help from piled-up dislocations [56].…”
Section: Deformation Behaviour Of Individual Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Martensite formation during incremental cooling of Fe-Cr-Ni alloys: An in-situ bulk Xray study of the grain-averaged and single-grain behavior [6]. The reason for these differences between alloys should be related to the three fundamental factors and presumably to the difference in the formation of martensite, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally known that deformation twins easily form in austenite, with its lower stacking-fault energy, 29) indicating that the reason why deformation twinning is suppressed in high-N steel is that N increases the stacking-fault energy of austenite. 2,3,30) In order to confirm the difference of the dislocation arrangement, the microstructure in both steels given 2% true strain was examined by TEM, as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%