2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The difference between the surface reactivity of amorphous silica in the gas and liquid phase due to material porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The determination of OH surface density in oxides is not a trivial task, as shown by the rich debate on the subject, especially when porous materials are considered. 39,43,44,[62][63][64][65][66][67] In this work, this estimation was obtained on the MSN sample by employing TG analysis, as proposed in ref. 43 and 44. The OH surface density of the MSN sample was calculated by measuring its weight loss during a ramp in nitrogen from 150 1C to 1000 1C (Fig.…”
Section: General Properties Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of OH surface density in oxides is not a trivial task, as shown by the rich debate on the subject, especially when porous materials are considered. 39,43,44,[62][63][64][65][66][67] In this work, this estimation was obtained on the MSN sample by employing TG analysis, as proposed in ref. 43 and 44. The OH surface density of the MSN sample was calculated by measuring its weight loss during a ramp in nitrogen from 150 1C to 1000 1C (Fig.…”
Section: General Properties Of the Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simultaneous analysis of the adsorption of polar or polarizable probe molecules at the solid-gas and solid-liquid interfaces is exploitable only when both the phenomena lead to similar distribution functions (Villiéras et al 2002a;Garnier et al 2007). Nevertheless, it has been recently shown (Prélot et al 2010) that the image of surface reactivity of amorphous silica may drastically change when passing from the solid-gas to solid-water interface, particularly when the interfacial phenomena are accompanied by the confinement effects. The fact that argon adsorption serves to evaluate non-polar adsorption energy distributions is also utilized to establish the size and shape of such crystalline particles as clay minerals (Villiéras et al 1997b(Villiéras et al , 2002b or goethite (Prélot et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the strontium sorption on XO75LS passes from 5.5 Â 10 À10 mol m À2 (1% uptake) at pH 7.1 to 1 Â 10 À8 mol m À2 (18.3% uptake) at pH 7.7, whereas the corresponding change in the surface density of negative charge is too small [36] to account for this effect. The hypothesis involving bulk interactions of appropriate cations with the dissolved silica, followed by the precipitation of the resulting silicate salts, cannot be validated in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This indicates that only a small fraction of the surface is involved in the overall sorption process. The weak retention of strontium on XO75LS, MCM-41, and MCF from acidic and neutral nitrate solutions may be ascribed to low density of surface charge on a porous or non-porous amorphous silica below pH 8.5 [36]. It should be also kept in mind that the adsorption of metal cations in the presence of a background electrolyte likely occurs via an ion-exchange mechanism [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%