2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235005
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dietary impact of the Norman Conquest: A multiproxy archaeological investigation of Oxford, UK

Abstract: Archaeology has yet to capitalise on the opportunities offered by bioarchaeological approaches to examine the impact of the 11th-century AD Norman Conquest of England. This study utilises an integrated multiproxy analytical approach to identify and explain changes and continuities in diet and foodways between the 10th and 13th centuries in the city of Oxford, UK. The integration of organic residue analysis of ceramics, carbon (δ 13 C) and nitrogen (δ 15 N) isotope analysis of human and animal bones, incrementa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 70 sherds were sampled, 16 from the preceding St Aldates phases 1 and 2, 28 from the Jewish Quarter phases 3 and 4 and a further 26 sherds from The Queen's College site (which is contemporaneous to the Jewish Quarter phase), to act as a direct comparison (Tables 1 and 2). Of these, 8 potsherds from the St Aldates phases 1 and 2 were published previously (Craig-Atkins et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 70 sherds were sampled, 16 from the preceding St Aldates phases 1 and 2, 28 from the Jewish Quarter phases 3 and 4 and a further 26 sherds from The Queen's College site (which is contemporaneous to the Jewish Quarter phase), to act as a direct comparison (Tables 1 and 2). Of these, 8 potsherds from the St Aldates phases 1 and 2 were published previously (Craig-Atkins et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, following the Conquest, zooarchaeological evidence suggests an increase in the consumption of both young pig and domestic fowl, this being most apparent in towns and at elite sites, such as castles, which is thought to reflect the influence of the Norman elite (Sykes 2007;Jervis et al 2017). This trend was also observed among Oxford's Saxo-Norman population (Craig-Atkins et al 2020). However, the complete absence of pig bones in phase 3 does not reflect this trend and the dominance of bird bones is far greater than that seen at other sites (Serjeantson 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The general trend of relatively high δ 15 N and low δ 13 C values for all eight of the crew are characteristic of a largely terrestrial protein-rich childhood diet in a C 3 ecosystem and consistent with isotope data from other late medieval British sites (figure 4; see [107][108][109] for European sites). Individuals with high δ 15 N and relatively low δ 13 C have been interpreted as representing protein-rich diets involving the substantial consumption of freshwater fish, omnivorous animals or crops and animals raised on manured land [28,41] (but see [30,31] royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. Soc. Open Sci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meats (most commonly beef and pork) and fish (both marine and freshwater) were consumed in different quantities by all levels of late medieval society, as evidenced by historical, isotopic and zooarchaeological research [ 25 – 27 ]. From at least the fourteenth century, the Church had placed greater emphasis on avoidance of meat for fasting rituals, leading to increased fish consumption [ 25 ], which is suggested in the widespread elevation of δ 13 C and δ 15 N values at sites from this period [ 28 , 29 ], but the impact of food insecurities may have also played a role [ 30 , 31 ]. However, by the time of the movement towards the Reformation in the 1530s, with the abandonment of the Lenten fast, there was a decline in fish consumption [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even less research has been done on Norman migrants, with individuals dated to the post-Conquest period more likely to be studied for dietary changes introduced by this elite replacement rather than individual mobility. The implicit assumption being that the number of 'Normans' who came over was small and that they would be hard to find archaeologically (or are buried in active churchyards and unavailable to study) (Craig-Atkins, 2017;Craig-Atkins et al, 2020).…”
Section: Vikings and Normansmentioning
confidence: 99%