1978
DOI: 10.3817/0378035031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dictatorship Over Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, not only did consumption become a legitimate pastime like in the West, but Soviet authorities sanctioned consumer goods as markers of distinction and means of self‐expression, and they acknowledged the uniqueness of the needs of each individual. In a society without elaborate marketing and advertising industries, the Communist Party became the creator of new desires, the promoter of new lifestyles, and an advocate for immediate gratification, rather than a “dictator over needs” as Fehér et al (1983) argued. This new depiction of work and consumption placed individuals’ rights—at least to gratifying work and to abundant and trendy consumer goods—above their duties to the state, Party, and ideology of socialism, sanctioning “a concern for oneself and one's immediate family … an emphasis on personal autonomy … on one's personal accomplishments” (Inglehart and Welzel 2005:135).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, not only did consumption become a legitimate pastime like in the West, but Soviet authorities sanctioned consumer goods as markers of distinction and means of self‐expression, and they acknowledged the uniqueness of the needs of each individual. In a society without elaborate marketing and advertising industries, the Communist Party became the creator of new desires, the promoter of new lifestyles, and an advocate for immediate gratification, rather than a “dictator over needs” as Fehér et al (1983) argued. This new depiction of work and consumption placed individuals’ rights—at least to gratifying work and to abundant and trendy consumer goods—above their duties to the state, Party, and ideology of socialism, sanctioning “a concern for oneself and one's immediate family … an emphasis on personal autonomy … on one's personal accomplishments” (Inglehart and Welzel 2005:135).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, everything peo le like and dislike in this E world has hardly anything to do wit insecurity, and can on1 be expressed in and through another overriding category: lac of freedom. [Feher andHeller, 1983, pp. 151-1521 Z The third feature represents a combination of two related maximization principles which together provide the dynamic element in Eastern European societies.…”
Section: Ideological Principles In the Dictatorship Over Needs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an overview of "totalitarian" conceptions of Soviet domination in the West, see Linz (1975). A distinctive variant of totalitarian theory, drawn from dissident Marxism, formed in East Europe in this period, best represented by Fehér, Heller, and Márkus (1983). For the "mono-organizational" approach, see Rigby (1977).…”
Section: Mapping Political Processes Of State Breakdownmentioning
confidence: 99%