Abstract:In this paper, we present how a dialectical perspective on phenomenological psychopathology, called Dialectical Phenomenology (DPh), can contribute to current needs of psychiatric diagnosis. We propose a three-stage diagnostic methodology: first- and second-person stages, and synthetic hermeneutics stage. The first two stages are divided into a pre-dialectical and a dialectical phase. The diagnostic process progresses in a trajectory of increasing complexity, in which knowledge obtained at one level is dialect… Show more
“…The data analysis was based on the DPh, steps of which are detailed in Messas et al [17]. This method is based on a hermeneutic elaboration developed by the researcher (second-person perspective) over the subjective first-person account offered by the interviewee in a semi-structured interview, constituting a synthesis between first- and second-person perspectives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenology has been considered one of the most relevant methods for carrying out this kind of study, both as a general investigation of altered experiences [14] and as a form of assessment of personal values in disorders like schizophrenia [9] or substance misuse [15], offering new tools for clinical decision-making [16]. In this study, we would like to extend this new scientific trend to AUD, through a dialectical phenomenological method (DPh) [14, 15, 17]. The DPh enables the researcher to describe some ideal types of experiences – in our case, of value experiences.…”
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Alcohol misuse emerges from a complex range of psychopathological experiences and personal and cultural values. For this reason, understanding the reasons why a person seeks treatment is crucial to effective care. This study aimed to identify the values which guide the decision-making process of persons seeking voluntary hospitalization for treatment for alcohol misuse, as well as the values of significant others. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A phenomenological investigation was conducted through interviews with 25 individuals (and family members) who had voluntarily admitted themselves to a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, with the objective of maintaining abstinence from alcohol dependence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The main factors that determined the treatment-seeking decision were damage to social relationships and fear of illness and deterioration of the physical condition; the factors related to treatment expectations were restoring personality and awareness of morbidity; and the single factor considered most important to the success of the treatment was willpower. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results of this study contribute to developing strategies for bringing care closer to the patient’s perspective of the disease and encourage their active participation in the formulation of care.
“…The data analysis was based on the DPh, steps of which are detailed in Messas et al [17]. This method is based on a hermeneutic elaboration developed by the researcher (second-person perspective) over the subjective first-person account offered by the interviewee in a semi-structured interview, constituting a synthesis between first- and second-person perspectives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenology has been considered one of the most relevant methods for carrying out this kind of study, both as a general investigation of altered experiences [14] and as a form of assessment of personal values in disorders like schizophrenia [9] or substance misuse [15], offering new tools for clinical decision-making [16]. In this study, we would like to extend this new scientific trend to AUD, through a dialectical phenomenological method (DPh) [14, 15, 17]. The DPh enables the researcher to describe some ideal types of experiences – in our case, of value experiences.…”
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Alcohol misuse emerges from a complex range of psychopathological experiences and personal and cultural values. For this reason, understanding the reasons why a person seeks treatment is crucial to effective care. This study aimed to identify the values which guide the decision-making process of persons seeking voluntary hospitalization for treatment for alcohol misuse, as well as the values of significant others. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A phenomenological investigation was conducted through interviews with 25 individuals (and family members) who had voluntarily admitted themselves to a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, with the objective of maintaining abstinence from alcohol dependence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The main factors that determined the treatment-seeking decision were damage to social relationships and fear of illness and deterioration of the physical condition; the factors related to treatment expectations were restoring personality and awareness of morbidity; and the single factor considered most important to the success of the treatment was willpower. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results of this study contribute to developing strategies for bringing care closer to the patient’s perspective of the disease and encourage their active participation in the formulation of care.
“…The structural version of phenomenology probes the experiential field beyond the first-person narrative, revealing the pre-reflexive (or transcendental) structures of abnormal experience. Such pre-reflexive structures, although by definition not accessible by the mere description of the first-person experiences, can be assessed both by a reflective endeavor of the experiencing person and/or by the second-person hermeneutic endeavors of an expert directly engaged with and attentive to the accounts of the individual’s life world ( Messas et al, 2022 ).…”
This paper argues that a dialectical synthesis of phenomenology’s traditional twin roles in psychiatry (one science-centered, the other individual-centered) is needed to support the recovery-oriented practice that is at the heart of contemporary person-centered mental health care. The paper is in two main sections. Section I illustrates the different ways in which phenomenology’s two roles have played out over three significant periods of the history of phenomenology in 20th century psychiatry: with the introduction of phenomenology in Karl Jaspers’ General Psychopathology in 1913; with the development a few years later of structural phenomenological psychopathology; and in the period of post-War humanism. Section II is concerned with the role of phenomenology in contemporary mental health. There has been a turn to phenomenology in the current period, we argue, in response to what amounts to an uncoupling of academic psychiatry from front-line clinical care. Corresponding with the two roles of phenomenology, this uncoupling has both scientific aspects and clinical aspects. The latter, we suggest, is most fully expressed in a new model of “recovery,” defined, not by the values of professionals as experts-by-training, but by the values of patients and carers as experts-by-experience, specifically, by what is important to the quality of life of the individual concerned in the situation in question. We illustrate the importance of recovery, so defined, and the challenges raised by it for both the evidence-base and the values-base of clinical decision-making, with brief clinical vignettes. It is to these challenges we argue, that phenomenology through a synthesis of its twin roles is uniquely equipped to respond. Noting, however, the many barriers to such a synthesis, we argue that in the current state of development of the field, it is by way of a dialectical synthesis of phenomenology’s roles that we should proceed. From such a dialectic, a genuine synthesis of roles may ultimately emerge. We conclude with a note on the wider significance of these developments, arguing that contrary to 20th century stereotypes, they show psychiatry to be leading the way for healthcare as a whole, in developing the resources for 21st century person-centered clinical care.
“…Consideramos que esse método é adequado, neste caso, para tal, pelo fato de que nossa análise está fundamentada de forma significativa em inferências tomadas do contato clínico e apenas secundariamente da experiência relatada em primeira pessoa de William. Existe, portanto, uma imprecisão hermenêutica entre o método epigramático e a análise psicopatológica convencional (Messas, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Cabe, então, ao psicopatólogo que se orienta por tal linha analisar essas estruturas e suas dialéticas (Messas, 2022) com a finalidade de apreender a essência de uma experiência, isto é, um modo típico de desproporção das condições de possibilidade (e.g., desproporção esquizoide, desproporção melancólica, desproporção obsessiva etc.). Neste caso, buscaremos expor aquilo que na relação clínica com William se mostra como uma desproporção ou experiência vivida tipicamente fóbica, diferenciando-a de outras desproporções típicas.…”
Este estudo busca analisar, sob a perspectiva da psicopatologia fenômeno-estrutural, o caso clínico de um paciente cuja existência propomos chamar de fóbico-digressiva. A experiência vivida fóbica, associada ao uso de digressões, dificulta a exploração do seu mundo interno, restando-nos as impressões oriundas da relação clínica. Diante disso, a forma epigramática, atmosférica em sua essência, revelou-se um método epistêmico adequado para a análise estrutural do caso, ainda que apresente imprecisões hermenêuticas em relação ao método psicopatológico convencional. Sendo assim, estruturamos nossa análise segundo as condições de possibilidade da experiência vivida postuladas pela tradição do método fenomenológico, a saber, temporalidade, espacialidade, corporeidade e intersubjetividade, buscando entender como elas são vividas pelo paciente. Em particular, também buscamos compreender estrutural e existencialmente suas digressões, bem como seu desamparo e sua paralisação existencial. Finalmente, discutimos as peculiaridades que vêm sendo encontradas no manejo clínico do caso, enfocando as possibilidades terapêuticas e as dificuldades que se impõem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.