1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1984.tb00951.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic value of α1‐antitrypsin globules in liver cells as a morphological marker of α1‐antitrypsin deficiency

Abstract: ABSTRACT— In order to determine the diagnostic value of α1‐antitrypsin (AAT) globules as a morphological marker of AAT‐deficiency of the Pi‐Z type, liver needle biopsies from a prospective series of 600 patients were stained with PAS after pretreatment with diastase and by indirect immunoperoxidase staining for AAT deposits. Serum AAT phenotypes of the patients were determined by means of isoelectric focusing. Thirty‐two biopsies were from patients with the Pi‐Z allele (31 MZ, 1 Z), and 568 biopsies from patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…these techniques have issues of low specificity with high false positivity (9) and no confirmed case based on either Isoelectric focusing (IEF) or PCR based assay has ever been reported in India. In view of this background, we attempted to determine prevalence of AAT deficiency among pediatric chronic liver disease patients in North India using diagnostic tests INDIAN PEDIATRICS 1016 VOLUME 47 __ DECEMBER 17, 2010 (IEF and genotyping) that are considered gold standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…these techniques have issues of low specificity with high false positivity (9) and no confirmed case based on either Isoelectric focusing (IEF) or PCR based assay has ever been reported in India. In view of this background, we attempted to determine prevalence of AAT deficiency among pediatric chronic liver disease patients in North India using diagnostic tests INDIAN PEDIATRICS 1016 VOLUME 47 __ DECEMBER 17, 2010 (IEF and genotyping) that are considered gold standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, not all patients who are heterozygous for the Z allele demonstrate PASD/A1AT-positive globules, as is demonstrated by their follow-up study in 1984, showing that only 47% of patients with a confirmed (through Isoelectric Focusing) Pi*Z allele demonstrate PASD/A1AT-positive globules (>3 um) on their liver tissue histology. [ 20 ] This suggests that the globules, albeit specific, are not sufficiently sensitive or reliable as a screening tool for heterozygous Z allele.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Teckman et al (9) (2015) suggest that this may be a weak association, since many patients who are initially cholestatic may have a good evolution, sometimes with spontaneous improvement over time. The PI*ZZ phenotype has also been associated with moderate to severe disease and constitutes the majority of patients with AATD liver disease (9,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver biopsy is not the gold standard, but it can contribute to the diagnosis, especially in countries like Brazil (4) , where phenotyping or genotyping are unavailable in the public health system. Specificity of the diastasis resistant, PAS-positive granules finding can reach 94% in patients carrying the Z allele (12) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%