1966
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1966.37.4.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Diagnostic Value of Redness in Gingivitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to BAUMGARTNER et al [16] and KOSHI [20], the gingival color is not affected by cornification. Kosm [20] is of the opinion that the thickness of the epithelium at the apex of the papilla is more responsible than the thickness of the epithelium as a whole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to BAUMGARTNER et al [16] and KOSHI [20], the gingival color is not affected by cornification. Kosm [20] is of the opinion that the thickness of the epithelium at the apex of the papilla is more responsible than the thickness of the epithelium as a whole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Observation of the changes in the color of the gingiva is, therefore, of vital importance in making a diagnosis. The color of the gingiva can be determined by such means as visual color matching [15][16][17], optical instruments [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and colorimetrical analysis of color photos [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first studies in relation to gingival color were published in the 60's when Ishikawa29 differentiated the color of attached gingiva from the color of marginal gingiva using his own visual guide. Years later, Baumgartner et al30 differentiated between healthy and diseased gingiva: healthy gingiva had a more pink color and diseased gingiva appeared reddish-blue. In 1980, Dummett et al31 stated that facial skin color was related to gingival and mucosal color in approximately 85% of cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it is known that plaque re-forms soon after a prophylaxis (Loe et al 1967) and with one exception (Rosling et al 1976), none of the currently practised methods of treatment have been shown to be effective in eliminating plaque and gingivitis for longer than 30 days. Thirdly, the sensitivity and specificity (Thorner & Remein 1961, Lennon & Davies 1975 and the intra-and interexaminer reproducibility in diagnosing early gingivitis are not good (Crowley 1955, O'Leary 1964, Baumgartner et al 1966, Davies et al 1967, Alexander et al 1971, 1972. These limitations were recognized by Ramfjord (1967) who stated that "These needs have never been assessed in a scientific manner and so far no ways have been generally accepted to assess the needs."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%