2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-006-0029-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic value of image guided percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy in equivocal mediastinal masses

Abstract: Image guided percutaneous FNA biopsy is a safe and highly accurate diagnostic method for equivocal mediastinal masses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar was observed in the study by Dixit R. 4 The diagnostic accuracy was 100% and 63.63% by LBC and CC technique of the mediastinal masses. This was well related with the findings of studies by Shaheen et al and Güllüoglu et al 28,29 Thin prep smears were adequate for evaluation in 90.36% (75) cases. Conventional smears made from aspirates of only 53 patients (63.86%) were adequate to make a diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar was observed in the study by Dixit R. 4 The diagnostic accuracy was 100% and 63.63% by LBC and CC technique of the mediastinal masses. This was well related with the findings of studies by Shaheen et al and Güllüoglu et al 28,29 Thin prep smears were adequate for evaluation in 90.36% (75) cases. Conventional smears made from aspirates of only 53 patients (63.86%) were adequate to make a diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our study had a diagnostic accuracy of 98% which is better than the diagnostic success rates of other studies [4]. Reported accuracy rates of CT guided percutaneous needle aspiration/biopsy ranges from 64%-97% with a small risk of complications, and these results were observed by B Morrissey et al [1], Westcott JL et al [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…[141516] The diagnostic accuracy of mediastinal lesions approached in the present study was 89.9% that is similar to the diagnostic yield in studies by Shaheen et al . [3] and Güllüoglu et al .,[17] superior compare to studies by Morrissey et al . [18] (77%), Assaad et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%