2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00261-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic performance of novel skin-based in-vivo tests for tuberculosis infection compared with purified protein derivative tuberculin skin tests and blood-based in vitro interferon-γ release assays: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a meta-analysis, DST showed 86% sensitivity regardless of age and the accuracy is 95.1%. More importantly, DST showed its highest sensitivity (100%) among children and 60% sensitivity among HIV-positive patients [56]. The most recent systematic review and a metaanalysis among sub-populations of adults and children with HIV, children, individuals diagnosed with TB, and those exposed to the disease for all four tests; Diaskintest, C-Tb skin test, EC-skin test, and DPPD test, had a similar agreement with IGRA and TST (80% and more).…”
Section: Tuberculin Skin Testsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to a meta-analysis, DST showed 86% sensitivity regardless of age and the accuracy is 95.1%. More importantly, DST showed its highest sensitivity (100%) among children and 60% sensitivity among HIV-positive patients [56]. The most recent systematic review and a metaanalysis among sub-populations of adults and children with HIV, children, individuals diagnosed with TB, and those exposed to the disease for all four tests; Diaskintest, C-Tb skin test, EC-skin test, and DPPD test, had a similar agreement with IGRA and TST (80% and more).…”
Section: Tuberculin Skin Testsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In recent years, conventional TST was modified into four newer simple skin-based test strategies: Diaskintest (Generium Pharmaceutical, Moscow, Russia), C-Tb skin test (Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark), EC-skin test (Zhifei Longcom Biologic Pharmacy Co., Anhui, China) [55] and the DPPD test (Host Directed Therapeutics Bio Corp, Seattle, WA, USA). All these tests utilize recombinant ESAT-6 (dimer) and CFP-10 (monomer) antigens derived from M. tuberculosis and modified to obtain better specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy, except in the DPPD test which is a recombinant protein based on amino acids from the N-terminus sequence [56].…”
Section: Tuberculin Skin Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and C-TST, recommended for use by WHO in 2022 [48]; these use the same M. tuberculosisspecific antigens (such as ESAT6 and CFP10) as IGRAs, but in the skin test formulation which avoids the need for laboratory processing [49][50][51]. Secondly, novel IGRA assays reduce the need for laboratory processing by using alternatives to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to measure interferon-gamma production (e.g.…”
Section: Diagnostic Limitations and Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a gold-standard test for Mtb infection makes it challenging to assess the performance of novel diagnostics. Specific skin tests (such as C-Tb, Diaskintest and C-TST) have sensitivities of 75-91% in people with TB disease, high specificity amongst those at low risk of TB, and an agreement of 80-87% with IGRA [48,51]. Newer IGRA platforms, such as the QIAreach-QFT, appear promising but have not been evaluated in population-based studies [53].…”
Section: Which Diagnostic Tests Should Be Used and How?mentioning
confidence: 99%