2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic performance of CT versus FDG PET-CT for the detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postpancreatectomy surveillance for the detection of recurrent PDAC currently includes serial assessment using CT imaging and CA 19-9 testing (30). However, recent meta-analyses have shown that CT and CA 19-9 only have moderate diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of recurrent PDAC (14,41). This study found that postoperative follow-up with KRAS ctDNA predicts recurrence with high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88%) and predicts recurrence with a median lead time of almost 3 months over imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postpancreatectomy surveillance for the detection of recurrent PDAC currently includes serial assessment using CT imaging and CA 19-9 testing (30). However, recent meta-analyses have shown that CT and CA 19-9 only have moderate diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of recurrent PDAC (14,41). This study found that postoperative follow-up with KRAS ctDNA predicts recurrence with high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88%) and predicts recurrence with a median lead time of almost 3 months over imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning long-time follow-up, intensified radiological surveillance for early detection of recurrence, for example with enhanced imaging techniques such as PET-CT additionally to standard CE-CT, has shown increased sensitivity and specificity in a recent meta-analysis of seven retrospective studies 64. Although this might be of future importance especially in EOPC patients, prospective validation is pending and enhanced protocols to reduce significant radiation doses of PET-CT need to be considered 65…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern radiation techniques require accurate and reliable GTV definition. However, there is a lack of Sensitivity and Specificity of CT imaging of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer [11]. As target volumes for radiation of recurrent pancreatic cancer are primarily based on CT, this results in uncertainty among radiation oncologists with high variability in target volumes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been improvements concerning imaging quality in the past decade, tumor tissue can often hardly be differentiated from postoperative fibrosis or other postoperative anatomical changes in locally recurrent pancreatic cancer. In a meta-analysis of seven retrospective studies, CT imaging's pooled estimated Sensitivity and Specificity were 0.70 and 0.80 and the ones of positron emission tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)/CT were approximately 0.9 each [11]. Nevertheless, FDG avidity in pancreatic tumors is only marginally higher than that of healthy pancreas parenchyma itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%